25 Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule
Dr. Nisha Jolly Nelson
Introduction
In the social and educational history of India, Mahatma Jyotirao Phule and his wife Savitribai Phule stand out as an exceptional couple. They were engaged in a passionate struggle to build a movement for equality between men and women and for social justice. Recognising that knowledge is power and that the progress of women and lower castes was impossible without it, they dedicated their entire life for spreading education. In this module we first discuss the contributions of Mahatma Jyotiba Phule to the development of education in modern India. We will try to understand Phule’s thoughts and ideas on education as an answer to the present challenges of education in India. His wife Savitri Bai Phule had the pride of being the first woman teacher. We will also look at the contributions of Savitri Bai Phule to the field of education
Jyotiba Phule
April 11, 1827 – November 28, 1890
Jyotirao Phule: An Educational Philosopher
Among many thinkers and theorists one come across in the field of education, Jyotiba Phule was the first who devoted his life for the cause of mass education, the education of backward communities and women (Bala and Marwaha, 2011). His thoughts and ideas were revolutionary. His single most concern was universalisation of primary education. He concentrated on such aspects as the need for primary education, the essential qualities to be possessed by primary school teachers and the curriculum of primary education. He gave importance to the upliftment of lower castes and women through education and took necessary steps for achieving this end. During Phule’s time education for women and those born into castes considered untouchable was like a distant dream. In such a situation he launched a momentous struggle for the education of women and lower castes, in-spite of threats to his life. For him education was not just literacy but a tool of social change in the real sense of the term. He was the forerunner of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar as far as education of the down trodden is concerned. For this reason Dr. Ambedkar considered Mahatma Phule his “Guru”. To Mahatma Phule education is the only panacea for eradicating social evils. It was his firm conviction that if social reforms are to be effective and lasting, persons at all levels should be educated. For this purpose he considered the spread of education as his life’s mission. Without doubt we can say that Phule was the pioneer of revolutionary thinking. He was rightly called the ‘Father of Indian Social Revolution’ in the modern age (Bala & Marwaha, 2011).
Early Life
Jyotirao Govindrao Phule (April 11, 1827 –November 28, 1890), also known as Mahatma Jyotiba Phule was an activist, thinker, teacher, educationist and social revolutionary from Poona. He lived and worked in Maharashtra. His father Govindrao used to supply flowers to the Peshwa families and others in Poona. Since Jyotiba’s father and two uncles served as florists under the last Peshwas, they came to be known as Phules. Jyotiba’s mother died when he was hardly one year old. He was brought up by a close relative Sagunabai. The Phule family belonged to one of the backward communities called Mali (Gardner), which was forbidden from seeking education and other rights that were enjoyed by upper castes. The Malis belonged to Shudra Varna and were placed immediately below the peasant caste of Maratha-Kunbis of Maharashtra. The orthodox Brahmins used to preach that shudras and women are not allowed to receive education and if they did so it would be considered an act of sin. In this background in a city like Poona which was the centre of brahminical orthodoxy, Jyotirao was not given admission in an Indian school. So his father sent him to a missionary school where children from all communities were admitted. But due to threats from some Brahmins Jyotiba’s father discontinued his education and he was assigned gardening work on the farm. Jyotiba was unhappy with the gardening work and he was extremely eager to continue his studies. Impressed by Jyotiba’s intelligence and his love for knowledge, two of his neighbours, one a Muslim teacher and the other, a Christian gentleman, persuaded his father Govindrao to allow him to study in a secondary school. In 1841 Jyotiba got admission in the Scottish Mission High School, Pune. After completing secondary education in1847, he decided not to accept a job under the government.
In 1848 Phule began his work as a social reformer. Interested in education of boys and girls of lower castes, he started a school for them. Since no female teacher was available, Phule asked his wife Savitribai to teach in the school. He opened two more schools for girls in 1851. He was honoured by the Board of education for the work he did for girls’ education in 1852. Phule established a school for untouchables and a night school in 1852. By 1858, he gradually retired from the management of these schools and entered the broader field of social reform. He supported the movement for widow remarriage in 1860 and in 1863 established a Home for the prevention of infanticide. In a memorial addressed to the Education Commission popularly known as the Hunter Commission in 1882, he described his activities in the field of education (full article can be accessed at http//ghalibana.blogspot.com/…/memorial-by-mahatma-phule-to-hunter.html). The government appointed him a member of the Poona Municipality in 1876. He continued as a member till 1882 and fought for the cause of oppressed.
Phule’s Writings
Phule was not only a leader and organiser of the movement for the emancipation of lower castes, but he was also an original thinker who had revolutionary ideas which he expressed through his books. Some of his major works were Tritiya Ratna (1855), Brahmananche Kasab (1869), Gulamgiri (1873), Shetkaryacha Aasud (1883), Satsar Vol I (1885), Satsar Vol II (1885), Ishara (October 1, 1885) and Saravajanik Satyadharma Pustak. In all he worked for achieving his motive i.e., universal education, education for women and uplift of people who were ostracised by the caste system. In Brahmananche Kasab (1869) Phule exposed the exploitation being meted out by Brahmin priests. In Gulamgiri (1873) he gave a historical account of the slavery of lower castes. In 1883 he published a collection of his speeches under the title Shetkaryarcha Aasud (The cultivator’s whip-cord) in which he analysed how peasants were being exploited in those days. We find a text of his philosophical statement in Sarvajanik Satyadharma Pustak (A book of True Religion for All) published in 1891, a year after his death. From his writings we come to know that his thinking on social and political issues was influenced by Christianity and the ideas of Thomas Paine (1737-1809) who was known for his religious radicalism in England. Phule himself has recorded that he was influenced by the ideas of Paine. As a recognition of his great work for the upliftment of the oppressed, Phule was conferred the title of ‘Mahatma’ in 1888. Phule wrote in Marathi language that was familiar to the masses.
Views of Jyotiba Phule on Primary Education and Primary School Teachers
The submission by Jyotirao Phule to Hunter Commission is a document of immense importance in the history of educational reforms in India. The document contains ideas such as free and compulsory education to all now enshrined in the Constitution of India. It is probably the first document of its kind that speaks of creating a taste for education among the masses and making it accessible to all.
Jyotiba Phule had expressed his views on primary education and primary school teachers in a statement forwarded to the Hunter Commission. In his view, it was necessary to bestow prime importance to primary rather than higher education as it was the urgent need of the masses. The British Government which was gaining revenue from taxes paid by commoners did not in return providing any resources for giving primary education. Phule’s argument was that amounts received from the masses should be invested on their education in proportion to what the government was gaining and that education was to get priority in government expenditure. The need of the public was to receive an education that helped them perform their jobs and also carry on their day to- day activities.
The concentration of the British Government was on higher education rather than on primary education. Though Jyotiba Phule was not against higher education, he was of the firm opinion that the common masses were less connected to higher education. Their urgent need was primary education that had relevance to their lives. He wanted educated persons of high vision and intellect to direct their attention towards ensuring humanism in education. He was against the traditional view that education should be used as an instrument for mass exploitation.
Jyotiba Phule was a visionary who was also interested in educational policies. Therefore, in a statement presented to the Hunter Commission, he argued: “The present number of educated men is very small in relation to the country at large and we trust that the day may not be far distant
when we shall have the present number multiplied a hundredfold— all taking themselves to useful and remunerative occupation not looking after service (Hunter Commission 1882)”. Through education Phule was not just interested in temporarily raising the standard of living for a few persons. He was, in fact, thinking of the future of education for an independent India. His goal was to give Indian society an education that would not only have a permanent value, but also cultivate in the people a free mind and liberty of action.
Jyotiba Phule concentrated on the fact that the two important needs of an effective system of primary education were ‘quality teachers’ and a ‘good curriculum’. In his view a primary teacher plays a pivotal role in the education process. According to Jyotiba Phule a primary teacher must be a trained person receiving sufficient salary. He wanted teachers to be drawn from lower castes so that they could be given employment opportunities. Phule was also of the view that efficient primary school teachers should be paid more salary than others.
Educational Philosophy of Mahatma Jyotiba Phule
Jyotiba related education with access to justice, equity and growth for lower castes and women and asserted that only through education growth could be possible. Phule’s thoughts on education can be summarised as follows- ‘Lack of education leads to lack of wisdom, which in turn leads to lack of justice. This leads to lack of progress, which leads to lack of money and results in oppression of the lower castes’ (See Natarajan and Ninan, 2011).
Mahatma Phule was fully conscious about the importance of education as a tool of social justice and equality. In fact he saw education as the harbinger of a social revolution. The essence of the educational philosophy of Mahatma Phule was that ‘education is a human right’. He was indeed the protagonist of the ides of universalisation of educational opportunities. Universalisation of education basically means accepting and extending facilities of education to all irrespective of caste, creed, religion, sex and physical or moral disability. Article 45 of Indian Constitution is the symbol of victory for the philosophy of equality of educational opportunity propounded by Mahatma Phule. He also worked for education of women and virtually laid the foundation for opening up opportunities for women to seek formal education. This was especially true of women from the marginalised sections. For achieving his aims, he opened a girl’s school in 1848 at Budhwar Peth in the residential building of Tatya Sahib Bhide. He opened two more schools in 1851 among which one school was for girls of backward class. He had revolutionary ideas about different aspects of education.
Salient Features of the Educational Philosophy of Mahatma Phule
Since all human beings are equal, access to education must be uniform. Monopolistic controls over education must be curtailed. Universalisation of opportunities and compulsory education must be ensured.
While educating individuals, religion, race, caste and sex should not be considered. Education should develop humanistic values.
The education of women and other deprived groups must be given top priority for establishment of social justice. Education must serve as a binding force in society.
A primary school teacher must be a trained person and sufficient salary should be paid to him/her.
Curriculum must be utilitarian and practical so as to cover the needs of the society.
Preliminary knowledge about agriculture and health should be included in the curriculum.
There should be a differentiation between the curriculum of rural and urban schools.
Values that stand the test of time such as freedom, equality, fraternity, kindness, self-respect, devotion to one’s nation and internationalism should be developed through education. Professional ability and efficiency should be developed so that knowledge may be properly linked.
The downward filtration theory advocated by Lord Macaulay is not philosophically sound as it ignores the common masses.
Practical knowledge is superior to bookish knowledge. Hence primary knowledge in Modi (a special Marathi script) accounts, history, grammar, agriculture ethics and health should be imparted.
Though quantitative growth in primary schools is important, it should not be at the cost of qualitative growth.
The government must formulate the scheme of scholarships and rewards for deserving students and those in need of support (Marwaha 2010).
Phule’s bold efforts to educate women, Shudras and the untouchables had a deep effect on the values, beliefs and ideologies relating to the movement for social justice through education. His efforts unleashed the forces of awakening among the common masses. Education made women more knowledgeable. They became conscious of the differences between the right and the wrong and could analyse these differences with a scientific approach. They began to question the age-old customs which degraded them. Similarly, Shudras started claiming equality with upper castes in all areas of life. In short, Jyotiba Phule launched a movement for liberating women and Shudras from the control of vested interests and laid the foundation for a Backward Class Movement in India.
Relevance of Jyotiba’s Educational Philosophy Today
In today’s educational scenario Phule’s thoughts on education are very relevant. As we know, today education has been mostly reduced to information transmission. There is always a fear of examination because of bookish education. But for Phule knowledge was not just information. It involves questioning, understanding critiquing and interpreting knowledge. As early as in the 19th century Phule had given alternative education models. For him, ‘Education is the power to think clearly, the power to act well in the world’s work, and the power to appreciate life’. For Phule knowledge matters because it can question, change and transform the individual and society. Education can empower and make society more democratic. It can help in reconstructing, rethinking and in interpreting tradition. This thought of Phule is extremely relevant in the paradoxical context of caste in contemporary India- where despite constitutional provisions, caste discrimination is widespread.
Concluding Note
Jyotiba Phule was the first Indian educationist whose pragmatic views on education were honoured by the British rulers in India. He was a practical man with a profound philosophical background. The Indian educationists of his period and after were deeply impressed by the richness and originality of Phule’s thoughts. His educational ideas and principles especially in the field of women’s education and universal, free and compulsory primary education are most relevant in modern Indian society as elsewhere. It is not an exaggeration to say that the history of women’s education in India would be incomplete without making a reference to the contribution of Mahatma Jyotiba Phule. He is rightly called Mahatma.
Savitribai Phule and her Contribution to Education
Introduction
Savitribai Phule, wife of Jyotibha Phule, was one of the pioneers of modern Indian education. Her role in opening up educational opportunities for women, in spite of stiff opposition from upper castes and reactionary forces stands out as a classic example of courage and conviction. Savitribai is truly a role model. She was the first Indian to spark a revolution in Indian education by opening it up for girls and children of lower castes. She was the first Indian to place the notions of universal, child sensitive, intellectually critical, and socially reforming education at the very core of the agenda for the welfare of all children in India (Wolf and Andrade, 2008). According to Manas (2007), Savitribai Phule is modern India’s first woman teacher. She was a radical advocate of education for women and untouchables, a champion of women’s rights, a milestone of trailblazing poetry, a courageous mass leader who stood strongly against the forces of caste and patriarchy. Savitribai certainly had her independent identity.
Savitribai Phule
January 03, 1831 – March 10, 1897
Profile in Brief:
1831 – Born in Naigaon, Satara district in a poor peasant family.
1840 – Married to Jyotiba Phule.
1841 – Jyotiba began to educate her.
1848 -Became the first female teacher in the first school for girls in Pune.
1848 -Started a school for adult learners in Usman Shaikh’s wada.
1849 -18 more schools started for girls, Shudras and Ati-shudras.
1852 -Awarded the Ideal Teacher Award by the School Inspection Committee.
1853 – Started a Foundling home for children of widows.
1854 -Published first collection of poems Kavyaphule, making her the first modern poetess of Marathi language.
1855 -Began teaching in a school for peasants and workers.
1868 -Opened their well for untouchables.
1877 -Provided famine relief through fifty-two food centres.
1890 – Death of Jyotiba Phule.
1897 -Nursed patients during the plague epidemic.
1897 -Savitribai died of plague.
(Source:Krantijyoti Savitribai Phule Women’s Studies Centre, Savitribai Phule Pune University). Savitribai Phule’s Thoughts on Education
Savitribai was an educational philosopher well ahead of her times. She incorporated innovative methods for spreading education. She gave stipends to prevent children dropping out of school. She conducted parent-teacher meetings to involve the parents in the educational process so that they would understand the importance of education and support their children. Savitribai’s message was ‘work hard, study well and do good’. She constantly underscored the importance of education and physical work for knowledge and prosperity. She felt that women must receive education as they were in no way inferior to men; they were not slaves of men (Mani and Sardar 1988).
Savitribai Phule developed a framework for education for the masses which had the following four key features:
1. Universal available
2. Child sensitive
3. Intellectually critical and
4. Socially reforming
Each of these features is explained in the section that follows:
Universally Available
Savitribai was completely convinced that learning was for every child and that every child is equal and gave herself totally for this cause. She was a believer in the principle of universal right to education. Savitribai stood with Phule when he made mass education the focal point of his movement, and gave the highest priority to the education of women and children from lower castes, in particular Child Sensitive
Along with her husband Jyotiba, Savitribai concentrated on the needs of primary education, disapproving the government’s education policies which, neglected primary education and accorded lower status to primary school teachers as compared to teachers of secondary or higher education. In order to change this system, Phule argued that quality primary school teachers should be paid higher salaries than those who were not efficient. Phule placed a greater weight on practical knowledge rather than bookish knowledge, arguing that education should be utilitarian and practical so as to address society’s needs. For example, he believed that the primary school curriculum should be appropriate to the students’ contexts, arguing for a clear delineation between rural and urban curriculum, as well as the inclusion of useful and relevant topics such as health and agriculture (Wolf 2008). Savitribai echoed these thoughts in her educational approach.
Intellectually Critical
Phule also sought an education system that would educate the masses to think critically and to exercise their own independent reasoning rather than mechanically accepting assertions by persons in positions of authority.To Phule, the chief evil in Brahmanical domination over the masses was the promotion of unquestioning faith in religious texts and authorities that were imposed as divinely imposed. He strongly critiqued unthinking belief, superstitions and rituals, and sought to lay these open to empirical and logical rational inquiry. Phule argued that the first step to the liberation of the lower castes was to bring them out of the ideologies of Brahminism (Wolf 2008). For that, access to knowledge was the essential prerequisite. He termed his understanding of knowledge as tritiya ratna, the ‘third eye’, which he saw as knowledge that went beyond merely alphabetical competence to the power to see through hegemonic ideology, to understand the system of oppression in order to be able to dismantle it. Savitribai’s views on education were closely in consonance with the thoughts expounded by Mahatma Phule.
Socially Reforming
Savitribai and the ‘Truth Seekers Community’ believed that education had the key to bringing about fundamental changes in social attitudes. The goal in promoting education for the masses was not simply to temporarily raise the temporary standard of living for a few individuals, but to reshape the entire future of the nation. Savitribai included all children which included boys and girls and her special concern was for those ostracised by oppressive caste practices. She was a woman who challenged gender stereotypes, caste hierarchies and stands as a stellar role model to all those who want to usher in a new social order.
Concluding Note
The support, cooperation and companionship that Savitribai gave Jyotiba throughout his life are extraordinary and are beyond comparison. The standards that they set for following values such as equality between men and women and peaceful companionship go well beyond their times. The work that they did in the fields of education, social justice, eradication of caste and exposing the exploitative behaviour of the priestly class illuminated not only the past, but continues to illuminate the present.
you can view video on Jyotiba Phule and Savitribai Phule |
References
- Bakshi, S.R. and Lipi Mahajan (2000). Jyotirao Phooley In Encyclopedic History of Indian Culture and Religion: Vol. 5: Social Reformers. Delhi: Deep & Deep.
- Deshpande,G.P,(ed)(2002).Selected Writings of Jyotiba Phule. Manohar Publishers and Distributers:New Delhi.
- Gupta N.L. (2002). Mahatma Jyotiba Phule: An Educational Philosopher. New Delhi: Anmol Publications.
- Joshi, TL. (1996).Jyotirao Phule. New Delhi: National Book Trust of India.
- Keer, Dhananjay (1997). Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phule: Father of the Indian Social Revolution,Popular Prakashan:Bombay.
- Mani, Braj Mani(2005).The Debrahmanising of History:Dominance and Resistance in Indian Society. Manohar Publishers and Distributers:New Delhi.
- Marwaha,Navjoti.(2010).Mahatma Jyotiba Phule :An Educational Philosopher The Primary Teacher.Volume XXXV Number 3 And 4.July and October .
- O’Hanlon, Rosalind (1985) Caste, Conflict and Ideology : Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phule and Low
- Caste Protest In Nineteenth Century Western India, Cambridge University Press: England
- Omvedt, Gail (1977). Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phule and the Ideology of Social Revolution in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 6(37), September.
- Parimala V. Rao (2002) ‘Educating Women—How and How Much: Women in the Concept of Tilak’s Swaraj’ In Sabyasachi Bhattacharya (ed), Education and the Disprivileged: Nineteenth and Twentieth Century India. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.
- Pathan, Y. M.(ed) (1977).Mahatma Jyoti Rao Phule and Satya Shodhak Sumaj’ In Dissent, Protest and Reform in Indian Civilization,IIAS: Shimla
- Thom Wolf and Susan Andrade. (2008). Savitribai and India’s Conversion on Education.Vol.8.Oikos.WorldviewsJournal.