1 Colonial Period: Indenture, Kangani andMaistry systems

1. INTRODUCTION

 

After the onset of the industrial revolution in England, British colonial capital expanded around the globe. At the same time there was a huge demand for unskilled labourers for the development and expansion of plantation economies in the British colonies, mainly in the sugar producing colonies and tea and rubber plantation colonies. But “after the passing of the Act of Abolition (1833) by the British government, slavery [a source of cheap labour] was banned throughout the British Empire” (MEA 2001: 76) The sugar planters put acute pressure on the British government to combat the depressed sugar industry market, that went into a temporary decline after the withdrawal of slavery, a source of labour. Britain decided to recruit and export a large amount of Indian indentured labourersto the sugar producing colonies across the globe(National Archives 2007: p. 2).

 

India as a colony of British Empire, a ‘jewel in the crown’ became an ideal target for outsourcing cheaplabour as it had reserves of population who lived in poor socio- economic conditions. Further, they were burdened with unjustified taxes under the colonial regime.Therefore land holding peasants were turned to rootless labourers and eventually forced to work in factories and onto plantations through the world. To meet the ever increasing demand for labour, innovative recruitment schemes were devised by the British colonial regime, namely: the indenture, KanganiandMaistrysystems(See Kuper 1960: 2).These schemes were designed to transfer unskilled labourersfrom India to the British coloniesinteraliain South Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia, the focus areas of this e-module. It was against this background that Indians began contracting their labour from about 1834 to the plantations of the world until the indenture, Kangani and Maistry systems were abolished (See Reddy 2007: 1).

 

1.1.Definition, Origins and Terms of Indenture

 

Defining indenture: The concept of ‘indenture’ amounts to an individual being bound to work according to a prescribed contract. It refers to the “transfer of labour power from metropoles to colonies” or as a“ system of bonded labour with a resemblance to slavery” (Harris 2010: 147).

 

The indenture system commenced in 1834 to outsource Indian labourers to Mauritius, Uganda and Nigeria. Later, it was expanded to other countries: Guyana(1838), New Zealand(1840), Hong Kong (1841), Trinidad and Tobago and Malaya (1844), Martinique and Guadeloupe(1854),Grenada(1856), St.Lucia(1858) and St.VincentandNatal(1860) (Lal et al 2007). The colonial Government in India passed Act No. XXXIII of 1860 which extended the provision of Act No.21 of 1855 to include the Colony of Natal (Francis 1983: p.4).Immigration agencies were set up at the port cities ofBombay, Madras, and Calcutta, for the recruitment of Indian labourers. At each of the recruitment agencies, there was a government official- the ‘Protector of Emigrants’ to ensure that no coercion was used on the emigrant and that the emigrant understood about the five-year contract he was making. In Natal, the Act 14 of 1859 provided for the appointment of a ‘Coolie Immigration Agent’, in charge of the Coolie Immigration Department (Ibid: 5-6). Later the recruitment system was extended to St.Kitts (1861), Japan and Surinam (1872), Jamaica (1873), Fiji (1879), Burma(1885), Canada(1904) and Thailand(1910)(Clarkeet al. 1990).

 

The indentured labourers were popularly known as ‘girmityas’ (a colloquial expression for ‘those who signed the agreement’)(For details see Lal1997).The essential feature of the indenturelabour scheme was that it was contractual in nature. Under this scheme, workers could be contracted for a period of five years. This modality ensured a steady flow of labourers to the plantations in the British colonies.The colonial authorities permitted licensed recruiters to operate from Bombay, Calcutta and Madras. It was mandated by the colonial government that the emigration of labourers had to be on a voluntary basis, and a number of indentured emigrants did go ‘voluntarily’. However, several of them were also tricked or kidnapped by unlicensed recruiters or agents called ‘arktias’. These intermediariesdrew upon their “knowledge of local villages, shantytowns, temples, bazars, and railway stations to recruit the most vulnerable and desperate individuals” to recruit people and transferred them to licensed recruiters(For details see Kara 2014). The licensed recruiters took the potential emigrants to depots where they were briefed, medically examined and their travel papers were readied. They were then shipped in inhuman conditions, usually in overcrowded old sailing boats, which were later upgraded with the introduction of the steam ships. Records of deaths during passage from India to South Africa affirm that diseases and deaths were frequent during the long drawn voyages. Women were subjected to rape and sexual assault by fellow emigrants as well as crew members. But this exploitative system continued because the “transportation of human cargo was a profitable business” (Henning: 1993:30)

 

At the completion of their contact period the indentured labourerswere given two options; a free return passage to India or a contract for another term of 5 years of indenture. At the conclusion of the second term of contract they could claim free passage to India or a small plot of land to settle down in their new homeland in lieu of the passes for return passage (Kuper 1960:2).

 

2. INDENTURED LABOUR IN SOUTH AFRICA: A CASE STUDY

 

Indentured labourers were shipped to the province of Natal, the British colony in South Africa between 1860 to 1911 to workin the sugar cane plantations(Reddy 2007: 1).A less knownfact is that the “Natal government railways was one of the biggest employers of indentured laboureres where they worked as carriage builders, porters, signalman, lamp attendants and inother jobs” (Dhupelia 2000: photo no. 14).As per a report in the ‘Durban Observer’ dated 17th of October 1851, the first recorded reference to Natal Colonists’ demand for indentured labour was at a meeting of citizens held at the Durban Government School.Historically, it must be noted that the first Indians – four people – were brought to Natal as early as 1849. In fact, Indian engagement with South Africa goes back to the days of slave trade from South Asia to the Cape in the 17th century and later, the indentured labourers and free traders docked at the port of Natal. During the 17th and 18th centuries, over 50 percent of all slaves to the Cape were Indians from Bengal or the Coromondal coast in South India (Reddy 2007:1; Hofmeyer and Williams 2011: 2; MEA 2001: 75). They married slaves from East Asia, other Africans from the indigenous Khoikhoi and San inhabitants ( MEA 2001:75).

3. INDIAN IMMIGRANTS IN SOUTH AFRICA

 

Indian immigrants in South Africa can be categorized into three groups — ‘indentured’ immigrants who were in their contract period; ‘free’ Indians who had completed their period of indenture and stayed on and worked in Natal or other parts of South Africa and did not return to India; and ‘Passenger Indians’.Unlike the contractual indentured labourers, – thePassenger Indians paid their own fares and came to South Africa as traders, merchants and entrepreneurs. They were mainly from the Gujarati Muslim community, though some of them were from the higher-caste Gujarati Hindu communities as well.These immigrants were allowed to own property, engage in trading activities. They could own land as well as vote in local government elections (Bhana, Narendra, n. d.).For unskilled labourers, the colonial documents frequently use the term ‘coolie‘ ( with disrespectful connotations). People from varied socio- economic and occupational strata in India: Hindus, Brahmins, other high castes, agriculturists, artisans, Mussulmans, low castes, and Christians agreed to enter into indentured labour contracts. The push factor could be due of famines and economic distress in various parts of the country in the nineteenth century (National Archives 2007: 3). The indentured labourers were from different localities, cultures, spoke different languages and followed diverse religions. But a majority of them were Tamil speaking and about eighty percent of the immigrants were Hindus (Jithoo 1991: 346; See also Oonk 2007: 4-5).

 

3.1 The Demand for Indentured Labour

 

The British settlement governed Natal in 1843 as a dependency of the Cape Colony and later, in 1856 Natal became a Crown Colony. The Colony of Natal had a highly developed sugar-cane belt that stretched roughly for a hundred miles along the coast.The cultivation of sugar cane in Natal begun in the year 1850 (Chattopadhyay 1970: pp.19-22). There was an acute shortage of labour after slavery was abolished, because the natives from the province of Natal refused to work on the plantations. Initially the Natal planters attempted to address the problem by importing Chineselabourers from Java and offered thema payment of 10 shillings per month. But they demanded higher wages and therefore this option was not considered viable (Chattopadhyay 1970: 19-22).

 

The sugar planters then petitioned the Natal Government for an alternative source of labour recruitment. One option seemed to be through the import of labour from abroad.The Natal Legislative Council passed several Acts in 1859 including Act number 14. This Act gave rights for importing, regulating and governing immigrants at public expense. It also provided for the appointment of a “Coolie Immigration Agent”, in charge of the “Coolie Immigration Department” (Francis 1983: 5-6). Imported labour contributed immensely to the development of the plantation economy as evinced from the fact that for about “25 years (1874- 1987) the Natal government contributed $10,000 per annum from public funds” for importing foreign labour (Kuper 1960:2). Barring the eight years (1866-1897), when the shipment of indentured labour to South Africa was terminated, this system of recruiting continued until 1911. From 1911 onwards, the system of indentured labour was discontinued due to the lack of clarity about the “rights of free Indians” after they completed a period of ten years as indentured workers and the withdrawal of the provision of Crown land in 1891, to those who had completed two five year terms as indentured workers (Kuper 1960: 2-3).

 

3.2 Shipment of ‘Human Cargo’

 

The first group of Indian labourers boarded the ship, “Truro”, and landed at the port of Durban on 16 November, 1860. Another batch of indentured workers onboard the ‘Belvedere’ that sailed from Calcutta disembarked at the Port of Natal on the 26thof November. Both the ships carried 342 passengers each. This was the start of the 51-year period of export of human labour from India to Natal (Henning 1979:30). Some travelled alone, while others brought their families to settle in the colonies they would work in. “Of the passengers, 62 percent were men, 25percent were women while 13 percent were minors. Two thirds of the emigrants were Tamil and Telugu speaking Hindus from the Madras Presidency, and the rest of them were from Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Bengal. The majority of the immigrants were Hindus.Muslims and Christians constituted 13 and 2 percent of the indentured population, respectively” (MEA 2001:75-76). There was a gender imbalance in the group of immigrants that sailed to South Africa, as women comprised less than half the number of the adult male labourers Henning 1979:32- 34), though it was mandated that for every group of hundred indentured labourers that were exported to Natal, 40 percent had to be women( Kuper 1960: 17). By the year 1911, when the system of indenture to South Africa was abolished, the total number of Indians immigrants to South Africa was estimated at 1,42,670 (Chattopadhyay 1970: 39).

 

 

 

3.3 Reasons for Labour Emigration from India to South Africa

 

There were several reasons for the emigration of Indian labourers to Natal. These are;

 

i.   The abolition of slavery in 1833 in the British empire.

ii. The oppressive caste system which made the masses economically and socially dependent on the land owning dominant classes. This led to the lack of social and economic mobility amongst them and compelled the impoverished agriculturists to seek other avenues for livelihood generation, such as through emigration abroad.

iii. Decline of cotton and other manufacturing industries left artisans, smelters, weavers, spinners with little or no livelihood options.

   iv. Natural calamities due to failure of monsoons, periodic famines, crop diseases and unjust land taxation policies imposed by the colonial government further aggravated the economic plight of the agricultural labourers and artisans. Thus it is is no coincidence that during the famine years there was a rise in the numbers of dispossessed people who were willing to emigrate (Reddy 2007: 1).

v. Though recruits for plantations in Natal were drawn from various parts of the country, there was a higher proportion of Tamil emigrants from South India. The proximity to Madras, an important port of embarkation, and a tradition of emigration through the Kangani and Maistry( discussedlater in this module) systems to South and South East Asia could be plausible reasons for this ( For details on sources of labour recruitment, see Henning 1979: 21; Saha 1970: 75).

vi.According to Hilda Kuper, a scholar on the subject, the higher proportion of indentured workers from South India can be explained in terms of higher caste restrictions in the region and larger numbers of lower castes in South India ( 1960:18).

 

 

 

Photo courtesy: Natal Foundation Society (2010), South Africa.

 

This segment has offered an interrogation of the social landscape in the sending context of rural India and the lack of economic avenues for livelihood generation in the colonial period.

 

3.4 Suspension of Emigration to Natal

 

Working on the plantations entailed hard labour. Indentured workers were also employed in railways, coalmines, municipal services, as domestic servants and in other sectors as well ( MEA 2001:77).The labourers worked throughout the week for very long hours. The Wragg Commission of 1885 acknowledged the positive contribution of the Indian indentured workers in Natal ( MEA 2001: Ibid). Despite their immense contribution to the Natal economy, the workers were illtreated and subject to corporeal punishment. They were paid a meagre wage and deductions were made from their small salary on arbitary grounds. If a “coolie” fell ill, a shilling per day was cut from the wages of 10 shillings/ month. The commissioners supported these actions because they thought that ;“Indians were in a habit of feigning sickness to avoid work. This is known as ‘humbug illness’ or ‘ sham illness’ and is an evil everywhere” ( Desai and Vahed, 2010: 75).

 

Besides, the labourers were not given the ration which was agreed to in their service-contracts. These adverse working conditions led to a high number of suicides among the immigrant labourers(MEA, 2001:76-77). The returning Indians reported the harsh treatment they were subjected to in Natal, to the colonial government in India. The Natal government therefore organised the “Coolie Commission” in 1872, to look into the grievances of Indian indentured labourers in Natal. The Commission found many cases of ill treatment, underpayment of wages and lack of medical attention for the workers (Nambi 1985: 25-28). The colonial government discontinued the immigration of Indian Coolies to Natal between 1866 and 1874. During this period, trade was depressed and the employers were unable to pay the passage of the indentured workers.

 

3.5 Recommendations of the Coolie Commission

 

The ‘Coolie Commission’ was established at the insistence of the colonial government in India and the final report was submitted on September 11, 1872. According to Desai and Vahed, these reports were biased, though a few changes were made, the most significant being the appointment of a ‘Protector’( 2010: 75) . The findings of the Coolie Commission were accepted. Some of the important recommendations made by the Commission were as below:

 

·       A ‘Protector of Indian Immigrants’ (earlier known as the ‘Coolie Agent’) was to be appointed to settle disputes between the employer and the employee and visit and inspect estates where workers were employed.

·       The Protector was entrusted with the responsibility of registering and recording births, deaths and marriages of all Asiatic persons.

·       The derogative term ‘coolie’ was discontinued and substituted with the term ‘Indian immigrants’ (Chattopadhyay 1970: 39).

·       The Commission stated that the number of women immigrants to South Africa should be increased to address the gender imbalance among the Indian immigrants.

·       It was mandatory for the Natal government to provide educational facilities for the children of immigrants and make education compulsory and provide for the health of medical services to all the Indian immigrants.

·       Law No. 12 ( of 1872) exempted Indian labourers from corporeal punishment.

·       About 8 and 10 acres of land outside Durban city was to be allocated to the ex-indentured Indians,in lieu of free return passage to India.However, the provisionof allotting Crown land was discontinued in 1891 and the scheme of indenture was subsequently dropped in the year 1911( For details See South African History Online, Reddy 2007:1, Chattopadhyay 1970:19-22).

 

The Coolie Commission was one of several enquiries. The others were the Shire Commission (1862), the Wragg Commission (1885- 1887), the Reynold Commission (1906), the Indian Commission (1909), and the Solomon Commission (1914) in additional to several other smaller enquiries by the Natal government officials ( For details see Desai and Vahed, 2010:74). “ The ‘ impartial truth’ of such commissions allowed indenture to continue with minimum change for five decades” ( Ibid: 75) . Myers sums up the indentured system thus:

 

It was only after the coolie marked his thumb print on the contract ratifying this- the meanest and the weakest of bonds… after he had been assigned to a work gang… after his hands had become raw, then hardened from cane, after he had been beaten , fined , jailed, after his rations had been withheld- that the realisation came that he had not crossed the sea to paradise, that the beautiful Queen was not to be found…(cited in Desai and Vahed 2010: 83).

 

Since 1894, the Indian nationalists debated and expressed concerns about the exploitative system of indenture and the harsh treatment that was meted out to the Indian indentured workers in South Africa (Patel and Uys 2012. 49- 51). The Indian National Congress opposed the indentured labour schemes and highlighted the abusive nature of this mechanism. Finally, amidst national pressure, this system of labour recruitment to South Africa was dismantled in 1911.

 

Despite all the hardships and subjection to racist laws, only about 23 percent of the Indians returned to India by 1911. Recent work attempts to overcome a major shortcoming of indentured historiography that explained the phenomenon ‘as a one way problem’.Earlier historians did not study the impacts, causes and consequences of labourmigration in the sending context i.e. in India, during 1860- 1911. Further, women’s lived experiences and their struggles against multiple oppressions such as sexual violence and acts of resistance against the indenture system by this subaltern constituency that had been overlooked thus far, are now a subject of academic enquiry (See also chapters by Desai and Vahed, Mariam Seedat –Khan, V. Geetha, in Patel and Uys 2012).

 

4. KANGANI AND MAISTRY SYSTEMS

 

These were yet other contractual labour recruitment mechanisms that wereconsidered cost-effective, efficient, alternate and reliable mechanisms to outsource Indian unskilled labourers. Such mechanisms were devised to meet the demands of expanding merchant capital under the aegis of British imperialism in Ceylon (present day Sri Lanka), Malaya (present day Malaysia) and Burma (present day Myanmar). In fact, the Kangani system coexisted with other forms of recruitment systems in Malaya such as the indenture system and after the decline of this mechanism in 1910, the Kanganimethod gained prominence. This was also the time when large tea and coffee plantations shifted to cultivating rubber in the mid-19th century (For details see Parmer (1960); Sandhu (1969).

 

4.1Background

 

The terms KanganiandMaistry are drawn from the Tamil language and can be translated as ‘headman’, ‘foreman’ or ‘overseer’, while Maistry means a ‘supervisor’. Kanganiis an anglicized form of the Tamil word ‘Kankani’ and describes persons who oversee workers (kan means ‘eye’, kani means ‘keep watch’). The term was originally used for those who supervised the agricultural labourers on temple land in South India. The term ‘Kangani’ was restricted to men [male supervisors] (Heidemann1992:8).

 

Though both the systems shared common characteristics, there were differences among them as well. The Kangani system wasexecuted in Ceylon and Malaya, while labour was recruited through the Maistry system in Burma. Both these systems used ‘middlemen’ and introduced a debt-bondage relationship to recruit labourers for plantations in theBritishcolonies(Jain, 1990:16).

 

The Kanganimobilized or recruited thelabourers from their own extended family members,castefellows ormen from their ownvillage by advancing money for their passage. Hence, the Kanganisystem of labour recruitment was based on the linkages at the village, kinship, caste and region level as well as a debt-bondage relationship. The Kanganisystem was initially introduced to recruit labour for coffee and tea plantations of Ceylon in the early nineteenth century. It was extended to Malaya in the late 19thcentury. This system was disbanded in 1938 subsequent to the banning of Indian immigration to Malaya in the same year. In the case of Ceylon, the Kangani system came into existence most likely in the 1820s or latest by the year 1830 and remained in practice until 1940.

 

Between 1840 and 1942, under these two systems, it is estimated that over 1.7 million Indians were recruited to work in Malaya (including Singapore), over 1.6 million to Burma and approximately one million to Ceylon (Lal 2007: 53). Through the Kangani and Maistry systems, labour was recruited from the erstwhile Madras Presidency, in the 19th century. Surplus labour force from the hinterlands in Tamil Nadu were transferred to the tea, coffee and rubber plantations of Western Ghats, Ceylon, Malaya and for rice farming in Burma (Baker1984:179).

 

The segment below discusses in details the nature and characteristics of KanganiandMaistry systems.

 

4.2 Nature and Characteristics of the Kangani System

 

The Kanganisystem was a strategy for labour mobilization to develop plantation agriculture in Ceylon and Malaya. Thissystem originated in the Tamil region of southern India. The Kanganiswere Indian recruiters who were dispatched to India bythe plantation owners with the payment of an advance sum for recruiting prospective labourers or‘coolies’ to work in the plantationsabroad.TheKangani system of labourrecruitment was based on the close ties of village, kinship, caste, region and debt-bondage relationships (For details see Arasaratnam1970; Sandhu1969). TheKanganis were intermediaries who provided an advance payment to the ‘coolies’ to cover their transportation cost by ship.

 

On arrival at the plantation, these groups of labourers of about 25- 20 people each were supervised by the Kangani, usuallyexperienced and elderly persons, who were placed above the labourers in the economic hierarchy of the plantation. They formed the main link between the management and the labour force. They were said to be “generally of good caste” and “persons of influence among others and subordinate castes in the village…. who could command the respect of as wider a sector of the community of his village and district as possible” (Arasaratnam1970:17). However, the Kanganilabour recruitment was not foolproof and known for malpractices, use of coercive, abusive and fraudulent methods since they were tempted by monetary gains offered by the plantation owners for each recruit( Heidemann1992:59).

 

To control the labourers, the Kanganiwasauthorized to punish the defaulters without any prosecution. He was free to choose the methods of social control, which ranged from paternalism to brutal arbitrariness (Heidemann1992:70-71). The Kangani was not a “mediator of conflicts between labour and capital: he was very much the agent of capital and his primary role was to subject labour to the rigorous discipline required by the plantation production system”(Ramasamy1992:99).In contrast to the Kangani system of Ceylon, the KanganisinMalaya had less power because the labourers received wages directly from the plantation management (For details see Jain 1993). As compared to the indenture system, the Kangani system assumed significance because it ensured a reliable, stable labour supply and smooth functioning of the plantations, given the close ties of ascription and subordination of the labourers due to debt-bondage relationship.

The labour relationship of Kangani was dynamic in nature. Not only was he the recruiter-cum – foreman or overseer of the labourers, but their patron, negotiator, entrepreneur and financier as well. The Kangani intervened and took decisions on professional matters of the labourersand mediated in their domestic disputes. The Kanganiacted as an ‘inevitable link’ or ‘intermediary’ between the planters and labourers in the plantation economic structure (Jain 1993:2368) Further, family, kin and caste ties were preserved and respected much more in the Kangani system than under indenture (Jain 1988:128). Moreover, since the Kangani recruited labourers from his kindred or village folks of his own region,the physical quality of the labourers was satisfactory in contrast to recruitments through theindenture system. Besides, the Kanganisystem resolved the gender imbalance on the plantations as it encouraged family migration.

 

In contrast to the Kanganisystem of Ceylon, the Kangani system of Malaya was less dependent on the Kangani, as the recruitment process was controlled or regulated by the planters through their recruitment firms. Thus theKanganihad to depend on or coordinate with the recruitment firms.Moreover, the Kanganiof Malaya was not the centre of the plantation system unlike in Ceylon, because the plantation management in Malaya disbursed wages directly to the labourers. In addition, due to the existence of aplantation bureaucracy, the planters exercised strong control over both the Kangani and the labourers. Thus, the position of Kanganiin Ceylon was more dominant as compared his counterpart inMalaya.

 

Maistry System in Burma

 

The Maistrysystem was a variant of the Kanganisystem in terms of recruitment and subordination of labourers to meet the growing demands of unskilled labourers for the colonial economy of Burma. The majority of labourers were drawn from the Andhra region of the erstwhile Madras Presidency. The Workmen’s Breach of Contract Act of 1869 and the Labour Act of 1876 encouraged and established the Maistrysystem for labourrecruitment in Burma. The British India Steam Navigation handled the labour traffic between Burma and India.

 

The employers in Burma preferred recruiting Indian workers through the Maistries as they found this system cheaper and more manageable. The Maistrysystem, unlike the Kanganisystem, was relatively more structured, hierarchically graded and had a well-defined labour relationship wherein the “Labour Contractor, the Head Maistry, the Charge Maistryand the Gang Maistry constituted the hierarchy of middlemen employers” (Kondapi1951: 41).

 

The main characteristic of the Maistry system of labour recruitment was the enslavement of labourers to the middlemen-employers due to the debt-bondage system. The recruits were controlled through illegal deductions of wages and its disbursement by middlemen-employers. The system was highly exploitative and coercive. The same wages werepaid for work in the daytime as well as at night. Further, in contrast to the Kangani system, under the Maistry scheme, the labourers were subservienttothe Maistryand not to the factory or rice farm owners.Besides, the position of the Maistrywas dominant because he had the power to dismiss thelabourers arbitrarily (AdapaSatyanarayana2001:16).

 

The Act of 1869 was repealed later as it was very oppressive and aggravated labour relations. The Maistry system was finally abolished in 1937 due to the poor safeguards and working conditions that it offered to its labourrecruits(For details see Kondapi 1951; AdapaSatyanarayana 2001).

 

Conclusion

 

All the three contractual laboursystemsacted as ‘agency’ for the mass exodus of unskilled labourers, the ‘coolies’ from India. These mechanisms were cleverly crafted to meet the demands of unskilled labourers in the various parts of the British Empire and ensure theircirculation between India and the Britishcolonies. The predominant role of ‘middlemen’ or ‘agents’ in terms of recruitment and the transportation of labour was the notablefeature of these labour recruitment mechanisms. These mechanisms offered an alternative to slavery and extended to the workers limited safeguards to their working conditions (Kuper 1960: 2). Despite all the hardships that the Indian immigrant workers were subjected to, a majority of them stayed on in their countries of adoption. Over the years they have exhibited resilience, and through their hard work and resolve, their descendants haveadapted to the socio- political and economic circumstances in their host contexts. Today, the descendants of these working class emigrants constitute significant ethnic minority communities in their respective countries of adoption were born and grew up in and now consider as their home.

 

REFERENCES Books

  • Arasaratnam, S. (1970) Indian in Malaysia and Singapore. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Baker, C. J. (1984)An Indian Rural Economy 1880-1955: The Tamil Nadu Countryside. Oxford:Clarendon Press.
  • Breman, Jan. (1989) Taming the Coolie Beast: Plantation Society and the Colonial Order in Southeast Asia. NewDelhi: Oxford University Press.
  • Chabbra, HariSharan (1986) India and Africa: a Saga of Friendship. New Delhi: Thomas Press Ltd.
  • Chakravarti, N.R. (1971) The Indian Minority in Burma – The Rise and Decline of an Immigrant Community. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Chattopadhyay, Haraprasad (1970) Indians in Africa. Calcutta: Book land Pvt. Ltd.
  • Clarke, C., et.al. (Eds.) (1990) South Asians Overseas: Migration and Ethnicity. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Gangulee, Nagendranath (1947) Indians in the Empire Overseas: A Survey Charles Freer Andrews Memorial Volume. New Delhi: New India Publishing House.
  • Heidemann, Frank M. (1992) Kanganies in Sri Lanka and Malaysia: Tamil Recruiter-Cum-Foreman as a Sociological Category in the 19th and 20th Century.München (AnaconVerlag): Tokyo University of Foreign Studies (mimeographed).
  • Henning, C.G (1979) The Indentured Indian in Natal. New Delhi: Promilla and Co. Publishers.
  • Hofmeyer, Isabel and Williams, Michelle (ed.) (2011) South Africa and India Shaping the Global South. South Africa: Wits University Press.
  • Jain, R. K. (1988) Overseas Indians in Malaysia and the Carribbean: Comparative Notes. In Howard Johnson (ed.) After the Crossing. London: Frank Cass.
  • Jain, R. K., (1970) South Indians on the Plantation Frontier in Malaya. London: New Haven.
  • Jayaraman, R. (1975) Caste Continuities in Ceylon: A Study of the Social Structure in Three Tea Estates. Bombay: Popular Prakashan.
  • Kara, Siddharth (2014) Bonded Labor: Tackling the System of Slavery in South Asia. New York:Columbia University Press.
  • Kondapi, C. (1951) Indian Overseas, 1838-1949. New Delhi: Indian Council of World Affairs.
  • Kuper, Hilda (1960) Indian People in Natal. Natal: University Press.
  • Lal, Brij V. (1983) Girmitiyas: The Origins of the Fiji Indians. Canberra: Journal of Pacific History Inc.
  • Myers H. (1998) Music of Hindu Trinidad: Somgs from the Indian Diaspora.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Nambi, Arooran. K (1985) Indians in Natal. Thanjavur: Tamil University.
  • Oonk, Gijsbert (2007) Global Indian Diasporas Exploring Trajectories of Migration and Theory.Netherlands.Amsterdam University Press.International Institute for Asian Studies (IIAS).
  • Parmer, J. N. (1960) Colonial Policy and Administration: A History of Labour in the Rubber  Plantation Industry in Malaya. 1910-1941. New York: J. J. August in Inc.
  • Saha, Panchanan (1970) Emigration of Indian Labour. Delhi: People’s Publishing House.
  • Sandhu, Kernial Singh (1969) Indians in Malaya: Some Aspects of their Immigration and Settlement (1786-1957). London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tinker, H. (1974) A New System of Slavery: The Export of Indian Overseas, 1830-1920. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Uma DhupeliaMesthrie( 2000) From Cane Fields to Freedom. Cape Town: Kwela Books.
  1. eetha (2012) ‘In a faraway sugar cane field: imagining indentured labour in colonial India’ in Patel, Sujata and Uys, Tina (eds.) Contemporary India and South Africa. UK: Routledge.Vahed.G and Desai.A.(2010) Inside Indian Indenture.South Africa: HRSC Press
  2. Wesumperuma, Dharmapriya (1986) Indian Immigrant Plantation Workers in Sri Lanka: a Historical Perspective 1880-1910. Kelanya (Sri Lanka): Vidyalankara Press.