{"id":129,"date":"2018-11-14T12:19:06","date_gmt":"2018-11-14T12:19:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=129"},"modified":"2019-04-30T06:55:52","modified_gmt":"2019-04-30T06:55:52","slug":"atoms-in-external-fields","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/chapter\/atoms-in-external-fields\/","title":{"rendered":"Atoms in External fields"},"content":{"raw":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9vDVOMKriVo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"75px\" height=\"75px;\" \/><\/a>\r\n<\/span><\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>1.\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Zeeman Effect<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Zeeman effect is named after the great scientist P.Zeeman who in1876 observed that when a light source is brought into a magnetic field, each spectral line is splitted into number of components. This implies that the energy levels of the atom, those are involved in the transition, in the presence of a magnetic field, must split into several components. Thus the interaction of the electronic magnetic moment of the atom with the magnetic field results in splitting.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is known that the ratio of magnetic and mechanical moment of an electron in an orbit is<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-135 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-76.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"180\" height=\"56\" \/>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Also, the electron also has orbital angular momentum l and a spin angular momentum s. The ratio of magnetic and mechanical moment for the spinning electron is<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-136 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-77.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"184\" height=\"52\" \/>\r\n\r\n<strong>L-S coupling<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is assumed that the interaction between the spin angular momentum of the electrons on one hand, the interaction between their orbital motions on the other hand is large compared with the interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta of each electron and thus LS coupling holds (in case the atom has more than one valence electron).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThe magnetic moment \u00b5L is\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-137 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-78.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"111\" height=\"54\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">L is the total orbital angular momentum of all electrons. The magnetic moment \u00b5s then<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-138 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-79.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"111\" height=\"58\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>S <\/strong>is the total spin angular momentum.\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The vector <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess together around their resultant <strong>J<\/strong> in the absence of a magnetic field.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">When a magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> is applied, <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> couple with it and in the absence of coupling between <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong>, the latter precess independently around <strong>B<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">However, energy corresponding to coupling of <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> with <strong>B<\/strong> is smaller spin-orbit interaction energy, in weak magnetic field. Thus, <strong>B<\/strong> does not perturb the coupling between L and S under such condition. The <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess about their resultant <strong>J<\/strong>. Because of torque, <strong>J<\/strong> precesses around <strong>B<\/strong> at a rate small compared with the precession rate of <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> about <strong>J<\/strong>. The figure depicts the Precession of J about the field direction z in a weak magnetic field B<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-139 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-80.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"299\" height=\"285\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The total electronic magnetic moment <strong>\u00b5 = \u00b5<\/strong><strong>L<\/strong> <strong>+ \u00b5<\/strong>sof the atom is not oriented in the same direction as the total angular momentum <strong>J = L + S.<\/strong> This is because of different dependences of <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>L and <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>s on <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong>, respectively. The figure illustrate vectors <strong>L,S<\/strong> and <strong>J<\/strong> and the associated magnetic moment vectors.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-140 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"324\" height=\"228\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess rapidly about <strong>J<\/strong>, <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>L and <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>s precess rapidly as well, resulting <strong>\u00b5<\/strong> to zero and the component parallel to \u2013<strong>J<\/strong> remains a constant in magnitude <strong>\u00b5<\/strong><strong>J<\/strong>. The component of \u00b5 along \u2013<strong>J<\/strong> axis from the above figure is<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u00b5J = \u00b5Lcos\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 + \u00b5S cos<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nwherer <strong>J =L + S<\/strong> or <strong>S = J<\/strong> <strong>\u2013L<\/strong>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-141\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"522\" height=\"627\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nThis is called Lande\u2019s splitting factor\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>jj coupling<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In case where interaction between spin and orbital motion of the electron is large compared with the interaction between the spin angular momenta of the electrons on one hand and the interaction between their orbital motions on the other hand, jj coupling holds and hence the s and l of each electron are coupled together to form their own resultant j.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The figure presents the vector model for jj-coupling in a weak magnetic field. <strong>j<\/strong>1 and <strong>j<\/strong>2 couples together to give the resultant <strong>J<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"size-full wp-image-142 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"374\" \/>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-143\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"701\" height=\"593\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nThe angles between <strong>j<\/strong>1, <strong>j<\/strong>2 and <strong>J<\/strong> are constant and <strong>J<\/strong> = <strong>j<\/strong>1 + <strong>j<\/strong>2 or <strong>J<\/strong> \u2013 <strong>j<\/strong>1 = <strong>j<\/strong>2. Taking dot product of <strong>j<\/strong>2 with <strong>j<\/strong>2\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-144\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"302\" height=\"111\" \/>\r\n\r\nSimilarly,\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-145\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-86.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"166\" height=\"74\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\nSubstituting\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-146\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-87.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"245\" height=\"60\" \/>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The magnetic interaction energy resulting from the interaction between the electronic magnetic moment of the atom and an external magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> (directed along the z axis) is<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206E = -<strong>\u00b5<\/strong><sub>J<\/sub><strong>.<\/strong><strong>B<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here g is chosen depending whether the coupling is LS or jj. J cos (JB) is the projection of <strong>J<\/strong> on <strong>B<\/strong> that is equal to Jz. The allowed values of Jz are M\u0127 (M being the magnetic quantum number takes values from + <strong>J<\/strong> to \u2013 <strong>J<\/strong>, a total of 2J +1 value). So,<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-147\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-88.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"206\" height=\"46\" \/>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">This clearly mentions that the magnetic field lifts the degeneracy giving rise to 2J+\u00a0\u00a0 1 equidistant sublevels those are called Zeeman sublevels. The distance between two consecutive sublevels is gB<sub>e<\/sub>B. Let E<sub>0<\/sub> is the energy of the atom without magnetic field, and then the energy in the magnetic field is<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-148\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-89.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"127\" height=\"37\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is known that there is a relationship between term value T and energy E i.e. T = -E\/hc. The interaction energy in wave-numbers becomes<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-149\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"509\" height=\"101\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Where L = B<sub>e<\/sub> B\/hc is called Lorentz unit and its value is 0.467B cm<sup>-1<\/sup> when <strong>B<\/strong> is measured in Webers per square metre (tesla). The separation between two neighbouring sublevels is gL and is determined by magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> and g-factor belonging to the energy level.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nExamples\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-150\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"663\" height=\"566\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206M = 0 (p component or \u03c0 component)<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206M = \u00b11 (s component or component)<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206J = 0, with M =0 \u2192 M = 0 is not allowed<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nThe <sup><strong>2<\/strong><\/sup>D<sub><strong>5\/2<\/strong><\/sub> \u2192<sup><strong>2<\/strong><\/sup>P<sub><strong>3\/2<\/strong><\/sub>transition spits up into twelve components ( four p components and eight s components) .\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Example 2. <\/strong>Consider the transition between <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>. As <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>are singlet, therefore their g values are equal to 1. Fig. shows the splitting of the levels in weak magnetic field and allowed transition between them.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-151\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"511\" height=\"405\" \/><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">The allowed transitions from <\/span><sup style=\"text-align: justify\">1<\/sup><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">F<\/span><sub style=\"text-align: justify\">3<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\"> \u2013 <\/span><sup style=\"text-align: justify\">1<\/sup><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">D<\/span><sub style=\"text-align: justify\">2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">in weak magnetic field are shown in the figure.<\/span>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-152\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"661\" height=\"165\" \/>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">This indicates that there are only three distinct energies at A+a, A and A-a. Thus the spectral line corresponding to <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>transition splits into three components in the weak magnetic field, one at the same position and other two are displaced on either side of undisplaced line.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Now it is clear that when levels involved in a transition are singlet, only three lines are observed corresponding to <strong>normal Zeeman effect.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">If the levels in a transition involved are different from singlet, the anomalous Zeeman effect is observed.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Conclusevly, when the contribution of spin towards magnetic moment is zero, the normal Zeeman effect is observed and the spin contribution is taken in account, anomalous Zeeman effect is observed.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Representation of transitions between Zeeman sublevels on a normal energy level diagram can be understood with following arrangement.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">Write in a row all the values of M, for <sup>3<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub> ---------<sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub> transition. Below each value of M put the displacement Mg of the magnetic level of the initial spectral term. Similarly write down the displacement of the levels belonging to the final term in the next row. The vertical arrows represent the transitions \u2206M = 0 (\u03c0 or p) Forbidden Transition is represented by arrows of greater inclination. The line positions are expressed as multiples of 1\/r, where r is called Runge denominator and is the least common multiple of the denominator in the values of Mg. The usual notation for a Zeeman pattern consists of a long line with Runge denominator beneath it with integer above it to show at what multiple of 1\/r the components lie. The table demonstrates the procedure for obtaining the Zeeman pattern for <sup>2<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub>\u2192<sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub> transition.<\/span><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The g values for <sup>2<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub>and <sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub>are 4\/3 and 2, respectively. The vertical differences ( pi or p component) are 3\/6 and -3\/6 while the diagonal difference ( sigma or s components) are 6\/6, 5\/6, -5\/6 and -6\/6. In Runge notation it is written as<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-153\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-94.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"172\" height=\"59\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">With two p components being set in parentheses, followed by the four s components.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Intensity rules<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(i) The intensities of the components of one line are symmetrical relative to the position of the original line.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(ii) The sum of the intensities of combinations of a level characterized by the magnetic quantum number M with level M-1, M and M+1 is independent of M.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(iii)Sum of the intensities of all p components is equal to the sum of the intensities of all s components<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-154\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"463\" height=\"402\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">When Zeeman Effect is observed in a direction perpendicular to the magnetic field, only half of the intensity of the s component is observed. The other half is observed in a direction parallel to the magnetic field. Therefore, in studying intensities s components need to be multiplied by 2. A and B are constants in the above table that need not be determined for relative intensities within each Zeeman pattern.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The table holds for any coupling scheme. To determine the strongest component the following approximate rule is useful. In case where J1\u2260 J2, the vertical differences in the middle of the scheme and diagonal differences at the ends give, respectively, the strongest p and s components. If J1 = J2,the vertical differences at the end of the scheme and the diagonal differences at the centre give, respectively the strongest p and s components with the restriction that M = 0 to M = 0 is forbidden.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-155\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"612\" height=\"209\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>2.\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Paschen Back Effect<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In describing the anomalous Zeeman Effect, it is assumed that external magnetic field is weak compared to the internal fields; consequently the interaction between J and H is weak compared to the interaction of orbital and spin magnetic fields. The interaction between l and s starts loosening or gets broken at sufficiently large value if the strength of the external magnetic field is increased to the extent that it starts competing with the internal field.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Under this condition J starts losing its significance and <em>l<\/em> &amp; <em>s<\/em> interact independently with the external magnetic field resulting in the independent precessions of <em>l<\/em> &amp; <em>s<\/em> about J; their precession is much faster than the precession of residual interaction of <em>l<\/em> &amp; s about j. J processes slowly around <strong>H<\/strong> in comparison to l and s about J. This is known as Paschen-Back Effect. The separation between the spin components or between the Zeeman components is a measure of the corresponding processional frequency.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In the anomalous Zeeman Effect, the precession of <em>l &amp; s<\/em> about j is faster and therefore the average values of their components normal to j are assumed as zero in order to avoid the perturbation of other precessions.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">However, when the external magnetic field is of the same order as that of the internal fields, the case is different and the relation <em>-\u2206T=<\/em> <em>gLm<\/em><em>j<\/em> no longer holds good. Further, <em>l<\/em> &amp; s will precess independently about <strong>H<\/strong> as the field is increased and hence will become quantized independently in the direction of field H. The\u00a0<span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">figure depicts the precession of <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l &amp; s<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> about external magnetic field H and their space quantization.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-156\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"632\" height=\"435\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As each of the electrons takes each of the two values of <em>m<\/em><em>s<\/em> there are 2(2<em>l<\/em>+1) different quantum states; each corresponding to different combination of quantum numbers. The figure depicts space quantization for <em>l<\/em>=1 and s=1\/2 . When the <em>ls<\/em>-interaction is significantly loosened or broken, major part of the total energy of the atom consists of the energies due to the precession of <em>l<\/em> around H plus energy due to precession of s about <em>H<\/em>. Thus, the major energy shift is<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-157\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"575\" height=\"54\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Using equations for \u03bcl and \u03bcs respectively and substituting the values of cos(l,H) and cos(s,H) , the equation (1) reduces to<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-158\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"589\" height=\"40\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">In terms of wave numbers, -\u2206T=(m<sub><em>l<\/em><\/sub>+2<sub>ms<\/sub>)Lcm-1---------------[3]<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Though <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> &amp; s precess independently, but each produces magnetic field on the electron causing some perturbation to other\u2019s motion.<\/span><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Though, the <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">s- interaction is small compared to the effect of the external magnetic field but need to be taken into consideration. The separation due to this residual interaction is of the same order of magnitude as the field free fine structure doublet separations. Therefore, using equation 3 and that the j is vector sum of l and s, its contribution can be written as<\/span><\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-159\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"65\" \/>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">In field free l,s interaction, l and s rotate together as a rigid system about j thereby the angle between <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> and s is constant rendering easy evaluation of cos(l,s). In the present case angle between l and s is varying continuously because of the anomalous behavior of spin (s precess faster than l). This necessitate the use of average value of cos(l,s) that can be evaluated using trigonometry theorem, viz cos(l,s)=cos(l,H)\u00d7cos(s,H). Using this theorem along with the values of cos(l,H) and cos(s,H) from the figure (1), one finds<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-160\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"273\" \/><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Paschen Back effect of Sodium D<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">1<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> &amp; D<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">2<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> lines<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">: quantum numbers for the states involved in the transitions exhibiting Paschen Back effect are as:<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-161\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"684\" height=\"241\" \/>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-162\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"647\" height=\"338\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-163\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"372\" height=\"300\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Fig. 2. <\/strong>Transitions showing Paschen Back effect in the absence of ls-interaction.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The effect of the external magnetic field (weak to strong with respect to internal magnetic field) on the spectrum can be summarized as: as long as the external magnetic field is unable to perturb the inner precession, one gets anomalous Zeeman spectrum. On the other side, if the strength of the external field yields the magnetic resolution<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-164\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"223\" \/>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Fig. 3. <\/strong>Transition from anomalous Zeeman effect to Paschen Back effect.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">more than the spin \u2013orbit fine structure, that is normal Zeeman triplet, shown in\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">the fig. 3 (transition of interaction for WEAK to STRONG field). In a way, these are the two extreme situations; what about the intermediate fields, i.e. during the transition from relatively weak to strong external field? Usually this transitional zone is referred to as the Paschen Back effect.<\/span><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">It is noteworthy that the Paschen Back spectrum is not as simple as discussed; it is somewhat complicated and separation between the various magnetic field components is a function of external magnetic field.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-165\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"694\" height=\"260\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-166\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"615\" height=\"370\" \/>\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-167\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"644\" height=\"522\" \/>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nNOTE:\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is noteworthy that the weak or Strong external magneticfField is not in absolute term but is relative to the net internal<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">A week external field for one atom could be strong for some other atom. Magnetic field of 30k Gauss produces Zeeman separation of 2 cm<sup> -1<\/sup> in sodium; while the <em>ls<\/em> interaction yields J<sub>1\/2<\/sub> and J<sub>3\/2<\/sub> with a separation of 17.8 cm<sup>-1<\/sup> (a measure of internal field) indicating that internal field is much stronger than the external field. On the other hand, same magnetic field applied to H-atom, Zeeman separation (measure of external field) is much larger than the <em>ls<\/em> interaction separation (measure of internal\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">field) that is less than half a wavenumber. Thus the field which is weak in case of sodium is strong for H-atom.<\/span><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">3.<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The Stark Effect<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">When a source of light is placed in an electric field, the spectral lines split up into number of components. The Stark effect is due to the interaction between the electric moment of the atom and the external electric field. The term to the interaction energy is,<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">W = -p. E,<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here p is the electric dipole moment and E is the external field.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Electric dipole moment in atoms arises as a consequence of the way that charge is distributed within atoms. There exist two aspects of the Stark effect:<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>the linear effect and<\/li>\r\n \t<li>the quadratic effect.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The linear effect is due to a dipole moment that arises from a naturally occurring non-symmetric distribution of electron charge, while the quadratic effect is due to a dipole moment that is induced by the external field. For simplicity the effects of fine and hyperfine structure are ignored.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Linear Stark Effect<\/strong>:\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In the Figure, the transition from the ground level (n= 1) to the first excited level (n=2) of atomic hydrogen is the simplest case of the linear effect wherein the excited level splits into three equally spaced sublevels under the influence of the external field.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-168\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"491\" height=\"425\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The spacing between sublevels increases linearly with the applied field. The central sublevels of n = 2 and the ground level do not shift in response to the field. NOTE: As a general case, an n level splits into 2n \u2013 1 sublevels that separate in the field at a rate that scales with n. Thus the higher n states are more sensitive to the external field.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As the linear effect is the result of the interaction between the electric dipole moment due to the distribution of charge with- in the atom and the external field. The dipole moment can be understood by considering an eccentric elliptical orbit.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-169\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"328\" height=\"363\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here the nucleus is at one focus and the electron follows a Kepler orbit that sweeps out equal areas in equal times.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The electron moves fastly when it is near the nucleus and slowly when far from the nucleus and as a result the electron\u2019s position averaged over an orbit is not centered on the nucleus. The separation between positive and negative charge centers here referred to a dipole moment. The size of the naturally occurring dipole moment corresponding to a highly eccentric orbit can be estimated, given that the mean radius of an atom in a state of principal quantum number n is on the order of n<sup>2<\/sup>a<sub>0<\/sub>, where a<sub>0<\/sub> is the Bohr radius. Thus the dipole moment, which is the product of the charge and the charge separation, is en<sup>2<\/sup>a<sub>0<\/sub>. This estimate is comparable with the observed moment of the stark Level, 3en(n-1) a<sub>o<\/sub>\/2<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">So, W=3\/2 enka<sub>o<\/sub> and k is called electric quantum number that ranges from +(n-|m|-1) to \u2013(n-|m|-1) for all possible values of m (i.e. from +(n-1) to -(n-1).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">K=+\/- 1that have the smallest dipole moments corresponding to circular orbits.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<strong>Summary:<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The Zeeman and Stark Effects refer, respectively, are due to effects of external magnetic and external electric fields on the structure of atoms or molecules. The effects are observed through the modification of spectral features such as strength, polarization, width and position of emission or absorption lines.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The structure of the anomalous effect is more complicated than that of the normal effect. The field dependence is also more complicated.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">In weak fields, the levels separate linearly with the strength of the applied field as they did for the normal effect; however, the rates of separation of levels are different, than those observed for the normal effect. In moderate fields, the levels shift in a complicated way that is not easily described by any simple power law. In strong fields, the levels again shift in proportion to the field strength but this time with rate of separation that are the same as those of the normal effect.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The anomalous effect was a mystery until 1925 when S. Goudsmit and G. Uhlenbeck\u00a0 introduced\u00a0 the\u00a0 concept\u00a0 to\u00a0 electron\u00a0 spin.\u00a0 Electron\u00a0 spin\u00a0 was conceived to explain why the fine structure separation of the 2P levels of alkali metal atoms were so much larger than the corresponding levels of hydrogen. Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck suggested that electrons have both an intrinsic angular momentum and an intrinsic magnetic moment. Following this assumption, the fine structure splitting was shown to be the result of the magnetic interaction between the intrinsic magnetic moment of the electron and an internal magnetic field produced by the electron\u2019s orbital motion.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>you can view video on Atoms in External fields<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9vDVOMKriVo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n","rendered":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9vDVOMKriVo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"75px\" height=\"75px;\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>1.\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Zeeman Effect<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Zeeman effect is named after the great scientist P.Zeeman who in1876 observed that when a light source is brought into a magnetic field, each spectral line is splitted into number of components. This implies that the energy levels of the atom, those are involved in the transition, in the presence of a magnetic field, must split into several components. Thus the interaction of the electronic magnetic moment of the atom with the magnetic field results in splitting.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is known that the ratio of magnetic and mechanical moment of an electron in an orbit is<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-135 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-76.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"180\" height=\"56\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-76.png 180w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-76-65x20.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 180px) 100vw, 180px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Also, the electron also has orbital angular momentum l and a spin angular momentum s. The ratio of magnetic and mechanical moment for the spinning electron is<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-136 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-77.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"184\" height=\"52\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-77.png 184w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-77-65x18.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 184px) 100vw, 184px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong>L-S coupling<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is assumed that the interaction between the spin angular momentum of the electrons on one hand, the interaction between their orbital motions on the other hand is large compared with the interaction between spin and orbital angular momenta of each electron and thus LS coupling holds (in case the atom has more than one valence electron).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The magnetic moment \u00b5L is<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-137 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-78.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"111\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-78.png 111w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-78-65x32.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 111px) 100vw, 111px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">L is the total orbital angular momentum of all electrons. The magnetic moment \u00b5s then<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-138 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-79.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"111\" height=\"58\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-79.png 111w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-79-65x34.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 111px) 100vw, 111px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>S <\/strong>is the total spin angular momentum.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The vector <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess together around their resultant <strong>J<\/strong> in the absence of a magnetic field.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">When a magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> is applied, <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> couple with it and in the absence of coupling between <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong>, the latter precess independently around <strong>B<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">However, energy corresponding to coupling of <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> with <strong>B<\/strong> is smaller spin-orbit interaction energy, in weak magnetic field. Thus, <strong>B<\/strong> does not perturb the coupling between L and S under such condition. The <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess about their resultant <strong>J<\/strong>. Because of torque, <strong>J<\/strong> precesses around <strong>B<\/strong> at a rate small compared with the precession rate of <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> about <strong>J<\/strong>. The figure depicts the Precession of J about the field direction z in a weak magnetic field B<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-139 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-80.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"299\" height=\"285\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-80.png 299w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-80-65x62.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-80-225x214.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 299px) 100vw, 299px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The total electronic magnetic moment <strong>\u00b5 = \u00b5<\/strong><strong>L<\/strong> <strong>+ \u00b5<\/strong>sof the atom is not oriented in the same direction as the total angular momentum <strong>J = L + S.<\/strong> This is because of different dependences of <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>L and <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>s on <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong>, respectively. The figure illustrate vectors <strong>L,S<\/strong> and <strong>J<\/strong> and the associated magnetic moment vectors.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-140 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"324\" height=\"228\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81.png 324w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81-300x211.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81-65x46.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-81-225x158.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 324px) 100vw, 324px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As <strong>L<\/strong> and <strong>S<\/strong> precess rapidly about <strong>J<\/strong>, <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>L and <strong>\u00b5<\/strong>s precess rapidly as well, resulting <strong>\u00b5<\/strong> to zero and the component parallel to \u2013<strong>J<\/strong> remains a constant in magnitude <strong>\u00b5<\/strong><strong>J<\/strong>. The component of \u00b5 along \u2013<strong>J<\/strong> axis from the above figure is<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u00b5J = \u00b5Lcos\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 + \u00b5S cos<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>wherer <strong>J =L + S<\/strong> or <strong>S = J<\/strong> <strong>\u2013L<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-141\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"522\" height=\"627\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82.png 522w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82-250x300.png 250w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82-65x78.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82-225x270.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-82-350x420.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 522px) 100vw, 522px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>This is called Lande\u2019s splitting factor<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>jj coupling<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In case where interaction between spin and orbital motion of the electron is large compared with the interaction between the spin angular momenta of the electrons on one hand and the interaction between their orbital motions on the other hand, jj coupling holds and hence the s and l of each electron are coupled together to form their own resultant j.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The figure presents the vector model for jj-coupling in a weak magnetic field. <strong>j<\/strong>1 and <strong>j<\/strong>2 couples together to give the resultant <strong>J<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-142 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"347\" height=\"374\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83.png 347w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83-278x300.png 278w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83-65x70.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-83-225x243.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 347px) 100vw, 347px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-143\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"701\" height=\"593\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84.png 701w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84-300x254.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84-65x55.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84-225x190.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-84-350x296.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 701px) 100vw, 701px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>The angles between <strong>j<\/strong>1, <strong>j<\/strong>2 and <strong>J<\/strong> are constant and <strong>J<\/strong> = <strong>j<\/strong>1 + <strong>j<\/strong>2 or <strong>J<\/strong> \u2013 <strong>j<\/strong>1 = <strong>j<\/strong>2. Taking dot product of <strong>j<\/strong>2 with <strong>j<\/strong>2<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-144\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"302\" height=\"111\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85.png 302w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85-300x110.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85-65x24.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-85-225x83.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 302px) 100vw, 302px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Similarly,<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-145\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-86.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"166\" height=\"74\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-86.png 166w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-86-65x29.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 166px) 100vw, 166px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>Substituting<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-146\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-87.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"245\" height=\"60\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-87.png 245w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-87-65x16.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-87-225x55.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 245px) 100vw, 245px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The magnetic interaction energy resulting from the interaction between the electronic magnetic moment of the atom and an external magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> (directed along the z axis) is<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206E = &#8211;<strong>\u00b5<\/strong><sub>J<\/sub><strong>.<\/strong><strong>B<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here g is chosen depending whether the coupling is LS or jj. J cos (JB) is the projection of <strong>J<\/strong> on <strong>B<\/strong> that is equal to Jz. The allowed values of Jz are M\u0127 (M being the magnetic quantum number takes values from + <strong>J<\/strong> to \u2013 <strong>J<\/strong>, a total of 2J +1 value). So,<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-147\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-88.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"206\" height=\"46\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-88.png 206w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-88-65x15.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 206px) 100vw, 206px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">This clearly mentions that the magnetic field lifts the degeneracy giving rise to 2J+\u00a0\u00a0 1 equidistant sublevels those are called Zeeman sublevels. The distance between two consecutive sublevels is gB<sub>e<\/sub>B. Let E<sub>0<\/sub> is the energy of the atom without magnetic field, and then the energy in the magnetic field is<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-148\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-89.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"127\" height=\"37\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-89.png 127w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-89-65x19.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 127px) 100vw, 127px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is known that there is a relationship between term value T and energy E i.e. T = -E\/hc. The interaction energy in wave-numbers becomes<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-149\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"509\" height=\"101\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90.png 509w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90-300x60.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90-65x13.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90-225x45.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-90-350x69.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 509px) 100vw, 509px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Where L = B<sub>e<\/sub> B\/hc is called Lorentz unit and its value is 0.467B cm<sup>-1<\/sup> when <strong>B<\/strong> is measured in Webers per square metre (tesla). The separation between two neighbouring sublevels is gL and is determined by magnetic field <strong>B<\/strong> and g-factor belonging to the energy level.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Examples<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-150\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"663\" height=\"566\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91.png 663w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91-300x256.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91-65x55.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91-225x192.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-91-350x299.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 663px) 100vw, 663px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206M = 0 (p component or \u03c0 component)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206M = \u00b11 (s component or component)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">\u2206J = 0, with M =0 \u2192 M = 0 is not allowed<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The <sup><strong>2<\/strong><\/sup>D<sub><strong>5\/2<\/strong><\/sub> \u2192<sup><strong>2<\/strong><\/sup>P<sub><strong>3\/2<\/strong><\/sub>transition spits up into twelve components ( four p components and eight s components) .<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Example 2. <\/strong>Consider the transition between <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>. As <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>are singlet, therefore their g values are equal to 1. Fig. shows the splitting of the levels in weak magnetic field and allowed transition between them.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-151\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"511\" height=\"405\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92.png 511w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92-300x238.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92-65x52.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92-225x178.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-92-350x277.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 511px) 100vw, 511px\" \/><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">The allowed transitions from <\/span><sup style=\"text-align: justify\">1<\/sup><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">F<\/span><sub style=\"text-align: justify\">3<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\"> \u2013 <\/span><sup style=\"text-align: justify\">1<\/sup><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">D<\/span><sub style=\"text-align: justify\">2<\/sub><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: justify\">in weak magnetic field are shown in the figure.<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-152\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"661\" height=\"165\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93.png 661w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93-300x75.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93-65x16.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93-225x56.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-93-350x87.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 661px) 100vw, 661px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">This indicates that there are only three distinct energies at A+a, A and A-a. Thus the spectral line corresponding to <sup>1<\/sup>F<sub>3<\/sub> \u2013 <sup>1<\/sup>D<sub>2<\/sub>transition splits into three components in the weak magnetic field, one at the same position and other two are displaced on either side of undisplaced line.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Now it is clear that when levels involved in a transition are singlet, only three lines are observed corresponding to <strong>normal Zeeman effect.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">If the levels in a transition involved are different from singlet, the anomalous Zeeman effect is observed.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Conclusevly, when the contribution of spin towards magnetic moment is zero, the normal Zeeman effect is observed and the spin contribution is taken in account, anomalous Zeeman effect is observed.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Representation of transitions between Zeeman sublevels on a normal energy level diagram can be understood with following arrangement.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">Write in a row all the values of M, for <sup>3<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub> &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub> transition. Below each value of M put the displacement Mg of the magnetic level of the initial spectral term. Similarly write down the displacement of the levels belonging to the final term in the next row. The vertical arrows represent the transitions \u2206M = 0 (\u03c0 or p) Forbidden Transition is represented by arrows of greater inclination. The line positions are expressed as multiples of 1\/r, where r is called Runge denominator and is the least common multiple of the denominator in the values of Mg. The usual notation for a Zeeman pattern consists of a long line with Runge denominator beneath it with integer above it to show at what multiple of 1\/r the components lie. The table demonstrates the procedure for obtaining the Zeeman pattern for <sup>2<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub>\u2192<sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub> transition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The g values for <sup>2<\/sup>P<sub>3\/2<\/sub>and <sup>2<\/sup>S<sub>1\/2<\/sub>are 4\/3 and 2, respectively. The vertical differences ( pi or p component) are 3\/6 and -3\/6 while the diagonal difference ( sigma or s components) are 6\/6, 5\/6, -5\/6 and -6\/6. In Runge notation it is written as<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-153\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-94.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"172\" height=\"59\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-94.png 172w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-94-65x22.png 65w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 172px) 100vw, 172px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">With two p components being set in parentheses, followed by the four s components.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Intensity rules<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(i) The intensities of the components of one line are symmetrical relative to the position of the original line.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(ii) The sum of the intensities of combinations of a level characterized by the magnetic quantum number M with level M-1, M and M+1 is independent of M.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(iii)Sum of the intensities of all p components is equal to the sum of the intensities of all s components<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-154\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"463\" height=\"402\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95.png 463w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95-300x260.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95-65x56.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95-225x195.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-95-350x304.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 463px) 100vw, 463px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">When Zeeman Effect is observed in a direction perpendicular to the magnetic field, only half of the intensity of the s component is observed. The other half is observed in a direction parallel to the magnetic field. Therefore, in studying intensities s components need to be multiplied by 2. A and B are constants in the above table that need not be determined for relative intensities within each Zeeman pattern.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The table holds for any coupling scheme. To determine the strongest component the following approximate rule is useful. In case where J1\u2260 J2, the vertical differences in the middle of the scheme and diagonal differences at the ends give, respectively, the strongest p and s components. If J1 = J2,the vertical differences at the end of the scheme and the diagonal differences at the centre give, respectively the strongest p and s components with the restriction that M = 0 to M = 0 is forbidden.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-155\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"612\" height=\"209\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96.png 612w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96-300x102.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96-65x22.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96-225x77.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-96-350x120.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 612px) 100vw, 612px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>2.\u00a0<\/strong><strong>Paschen Back Effect<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In describing the anomalous Zeeman Effect, it is assumed that external magnetic field is weak compared to the internal fields; consequently the interaction between J and H is weak compared to the interaction of orbital and spin magnetic fields. The interaction between l and s starts loosening or gets broken at sufficiently large value if the strength of the external magnetic field is increased to the extent that it starts competing with the internal field.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Under this condition J starts losing its significance and <em>l<\/em> &amp; <em>s<\/em> interact independently with the external magnetic field resulting in the independent precessions of <em>l<\/em> &amp; <em>s<\/em> about J; their precession is much faster than the precession of residual interaction of <em>l<\/em> &amp; s about j. J processes slowly around <strong>H<\/strong> in comparison to l and s about J. This is known as Paschen-Back Effect. The separation between the spin components or between the Zeeman components is a measure of the corresponding processional frequency.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In the anomalous Zeeman Effect, the precession of <em>l &amp; s<\/em> about j is faster and therefore the average values of their components normal to j are assumed as zero in order to avoid the perturbation of other precessions.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">However, when the external magnetic field is of the same order as that of the internal fields, the case is different and the relation <em>-\u2206T=<\/em> <em>gLm<\/em><em>j<\/em> no longer holds good. Further, <em>l<\/em> &amp; s will precess independently about <strong>H<\/strong> as the field is increased and hence will become quantized independently in the direction of field H. The\u00a0<span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">figure depicts the precession of <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l &amp; s<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> about external magnetic field H and their space quantization.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-156\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"632\" height=\"435\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97.png 632w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97-300x206.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97-65x45.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97-225x155.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-97-350x241.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 632px) 100vw, 632px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As each of the electrons takes each of the two values of <em>m<\/em><em>s<\/em> there are 2(2<em>l<\/em>+1) different quantum states; each corresponding to different combination of quantum numbers. The figure depicts space quantization for <em>l<\/em>=1 and s=1\/2 . When the <em>ls<\/em>-interaction is significantly loosened or broken, major part of the total energy of the atom consists of the energies due to the precession of <em>l<\/em> around H plus energy due to precession of s about <em>H<\/em>. Thus, the major energy shift is<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-157\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"575\" height=\"54\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98.png 575w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98-300x28.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98-65x6.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98-225x21.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-98-350x33.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 575px) 100vw, 575px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Using equations for \u03bcl and \u03bcs respectively and substituting the values of cos(l,H) and cos(s,H) , the equation (1) reduces to<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-158\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"589\" height=\"40\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99.png 589w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99-300x20.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99-65x4.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99-225x15.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-99-350x24.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 589px) 100vw, 589px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">In terms of wave numbers, -\u2206T=(m<sub><em>l<\/em><\/sub>+2<sub>ms<\/sub>)Lcm-1&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;[3]<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Though <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> &amp; s precess independently, but each produces magnetic field on the electron causing some perturbation to other\u2019s motion.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Though, the <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">s- interaction is small compared to the effect of the external magnetic field but need to be taken into consideration. The separation due to this residual interaction is of the same order of magnitude as the field free fine structure doublet separations. Therefore, using equation 3 and that the j is vector sum of l and s, its contribution can be written as<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-159\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"534\" height=\"65\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100.png 534w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100-300x37.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100-65x8.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100-225x27.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-100-350x43.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 534px) 100vw, 534px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">In field free l,s interaction, l and s rotate together as a rigid system about j thereby the angle between <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">l<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> and s is constant rendering easy evaluation of cos(l,s). In the present case angle between l and s is varying continuously because of the anomalous behavior of spin (s precess faster than l). This necessitate the use of average value of cos(l,s) that can be evaluated using trigonometry theorem, viz cos(l,s)=cos(l,H)\u00d7cos(s,H). Using this theorem along with the values of cos(l,H) and cos(s,H) from the figure (1), one finds<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-160\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"640\" height=\"273\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101.png 640w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101-300x128.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101-65x28.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101-225x96.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-101-350x149.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">Paschen Back effect of Sodium D<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">1<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> &amp; D<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">2<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\"> lines<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">: quantum numbers for the states involved in the transitions exhibiting Paschen Back effect are as:<\/span><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-161\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"684\" height=\"241\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102.png 684w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102-300x106.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102-65x23.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102-225x79.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-102-350x123.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-162\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"647\" height=\"338\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103.png 647w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103-300x157.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103-65x34.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103-225x118.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-103-350x183.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 647px) 100vw, 647px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-163\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"372\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104.png 372w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104-300x242.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104-65x52.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104-225x181.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-104-350x282.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 372px) 100vw, 372px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Fig. 2. <\/strong>Transitions showing Paschen Back effect in the absence of ls-interaction.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The effect of the external magnetic field (weak to strong with respect to internal magnetic field) on the spectrum can be summarized as: as long as the external magnetic field is unable to perturb the inner precession, one gets anomalous Zeeman spectrum. On the other side, if the strength of the external field yields the magnetic resolution<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-164\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"530\" height=\"223\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105.png 530w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105-300x126.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105-65x27.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105-225x95.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-105-350x147.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 530px) 100vw, 530px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Fig. 3. <\/strong>Transition from anomalous Zeeman effect to Paschen Back effect.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">more than the spin \u2013orbit fine structure, that is normal Zeeman triplet, shown in\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">the fig. 3 (transition of interaction for WEAK to STRONG field). In a way, these are the two extreme situations; what about the intermediate fields, i.e. during the transition from relatively weak to strong external field? Usually this transitional zone is referred to as the Paschen Back effect.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">It is noteworthy that the Paschen Back spectrum is not as simple as discussed; it is somewhat complicated and separation between the various magnetic field components is a function of external magnetic field.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-165\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"694\" height=\"260\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106.png 694w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106-300x112.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106-65x24.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106-225x84.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-106-350x131.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 694px) 100vw, 694px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-166\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"615\" height=\"370\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107.png 615w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107-300x180.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107-65x39.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107-225x135.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-107-350x211.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 615px) 100vw, 615px\" \/><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-167\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"644\" height=\"522\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108.png 644w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108-300x243.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108-65x53.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108-225x182.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-108-350x284.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 644px) 100vw, 644px\" \/><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>NOTE:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is noteworthy that the weak or Strong external magneticfField is not in absolute term but is relative to the net internal<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">A week external field for one atom could be strong for some other atom. Magnetic field of 30k Gauss produces Zeeman separation of 2 cm<sup> -1<\/sup> in sodium; while the <em>ls<\/em> interaction yields J<sub>1\/2<\/sub> and J<sub>3\/2<\/sub> with a separation of 17.8 cm<sup>-1<\/sup> (a measure of internal field) indicating that internal field is much stronger than the external field. On the other hand, same magnetic field applied to H-atom, Zeeman separation (measure of external field) is much larger than the <em>ls<\/em> interaction separation (measure of internal\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1em;text-align: initial\">field) that is less than half a wavenumber. Thus the field which is weak in case of sodium is strong for H-atom.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">3.<\/strong><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">The Stark Effect<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">When a source of light is placed in an electric field, the spectral lines split up into number of components. The Stark effect is due to the interaction between the electric moment of the atom and the external electric field. The term to the interaction energy is,<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">W = -p. E,<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here p is the electric dipole moment and E is the external field.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Electric dipole moment in atoms arises as a consequence of the way that charge is distributed within atoms. There exist two aspects of the Stark effect:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the linear effect and<\/li>\n<li>the quadratic effect.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The linear effect is due to a dipole moment that arises from a naturally occurring non-symmetric distribution of electron charge, while the quadratic effect is due to a dipole moment that is induced by the external field. For simplicity the effects of fine and hyperfine structure are ignored.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Linear Stark Effect<\/strong>:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In the Figure, the transition from the ground level (n= 1) to the first excited level (n=2) of atomic hydrogen is the simplest case of the linear effect wherein the excited level splits into three equally spaced sublevels under the influence of the external field.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-168\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"491\" height=\"425\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109.png 491w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109-300x260.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109-65x56.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109-225x195.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-109-350x303.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 491px) 100vw, 491px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The spacing between sublevels increases linearly with the applied field. The central sublevels of n = 2 and the ground level do not shift in response to the field. NOTE: As a general case, an n level splits into 2n \u2013 1 sublevels that separate in the field at a rate that scales with n. Thus the higher n states are more sensitive to the external field.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As the linear effect is the result of the interaction between the electric dipole moment due to the distribution of charge with- in the atom and the external field. The dipole moment can be understood by considering an eccentric elliptical orbit.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-169\" src=\"http:\/\/phyp10.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"328\" height=\"363\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110.png 328w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110-271x300.png 271w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110-65x72.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/93\/2018\/11\/1-110-225x249.png 225w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 328px) 100vw, 328px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Here the nucleus is at one focus and the electron follows a Kepler orbit that sweeps out equal areas in equal times.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The electron moves fastly when it is near the nucleus and slowly when far from the nucleus and as a result the electron\u2019s position averaged over an orbit is not centered on the nucleus. The separation between positive and negative charge centers here referred to a dipole moment. The size of the naturally occurring dipole moment corresponding to a highly eccentric orbit can be estimated, given that the mean radius of an atom in a state of principal quantum number n is on the order of n<sup>2<\/sup>a<sub>0<\/sub>, where a<sub>0<\/sub> is the Bohr radius. Thus the dipole moment, which is the product of the charge and the charge separation, is en<sup>2<\/sup>a<sub>0<\/sub>. This estimate is comparable with the observed moment of the stark Level, 3en(n-1) a<sub>o<\/sub>\/2<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">So, W=3\/2 enka<sub>o<\/sub> and k is called electric quantum number that ranges from +(n-|m|-1) to \u2013(n-|m|-1) for all possible values of m (i.e. from +(n-1) to -(n-1).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">K=+\/- 1that have the smallest dipole moments corresponding to circular orbits.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Summary:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The Zeeman and Stark Effects refer, respectively, are due to effects of external magnetic and external electric fields on the structure of atoms or molecules. The effects are observed through the modification of spectral features such as strength, polarization, width and position of emission or absorption lines.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The structure of the anomalous effect is more complicated than that of the normal effect. The field dependence is also more complicated.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">In weak fields, the levels separate linearly with the strength of the applied field as they did for the normal effect; however, the rates of separation of levels are different, than those observed for the normal effect. In moderate fields, the levels shift in a complicated way that is not easily described by any simple power law. In strong fields, the levels again shift in proportion to the field strength but this time with rate of separation that are the same as those of the normal effect.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The anomalous effect was a mystery until 1925 when S. Goudsmit and G. Uhlenbeck\u00a0 introduced\u00a0 the\u00a0 concept\u00a0 to\u00a0 electron\u00a0 spin.\u00a0 Electron\u00a0 spin\u00a0 was conceived to explain why the fine structure separation of the 2P levels of alkali metal atoms were so much larger than the corresponding levels of hydrogen. Goudsmit and Uhlenbeck suggested that electrons have both an intrinsic angular momentum and an intrinsic magnetic moment. Following this assumption, the fine structure splitting was shown to be the result of the magnetic interaction between the intrinsic magnetic moment of the electron and an internal magnetic field produced by the electron\u2019s orbital motion.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>you can view video on Atoms in External fields<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/9vDVOMKriVo\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"menu_order":7,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-129","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":3,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/129","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":679,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/129\/revisions\/679"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/129\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=129"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=129"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/phyp10\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}