33 Service Failures and Service Recovery Strategies

Dr. Puja Waalia Mann

 

1.0 Introduction

 

Have you ever been faced with a situation when you ordered dinner at restaurant and had to wait for more than twenty minutes for it to be served? What would be your reaction? Let us assume another situation, how would you react in a premium restaurant when served with cold food or may be stale food? It is expected that you will be loud and voice your concern to the waiter serving or to the manager at the counter. Let us assume another example, you ordered a product online and the e-retailer promised to deliver the product within two days, which did not come till seven days. On contacting the customer care department, you were given an excuse of some transport strike leading to the delay. How would you react to such a situation? Will you show your dissatisfaction with the services? The delay in serving food, serving of cold food or delay in the delivery of the product from the e-retailer are the examples of Service failures. In this module, let us look at the meaning of service failures and the strategies to manage it in such a way that the consumer feels satisfied.

 

1.1 Learning Objectives

 

In this module, you will learn:

 

a)      Meaning of Service Failure

b)      Reasons of Service Failures

c)      Consumer reaction to Service failures

d)     Service Recovery Paradox

e)      Service recovery management

 

1.2 Key Words:

 

Service failure, Service recovery, Service Recovery Paradox.

 

1.3 Service Failures

 

Service failures refer to a condition when the consumer does not receive the services as promised by the seller. Failures may just happen, and, these may happen in any large or a small organisation. Service failures may occur when a consumer does not get the delivery of the service as was promised during the service transaction; when the delivery of the service is delayed or it is too slow to be delivered; the service may not be able to deliver the core benefit due to which the service was sought to be purchased at the first place; or the employees delivering the service or confronting the consumer sounds rude or uncaring. Whatever be the reason of service failure it leaves a negative experience and in turn a negative image of the Service organization. Not all dissatisfied consumers may complain to the organization about a service failure. Few dissatisfied consumers may instead spread a negative word of mouth about the service by sharing their negative experience amongst their social circles. On the contrary, there may be some consumers who may prefer to take to the legal route to get them compensated for any service failure. Therefore, it is extremely important to ensure no service failure should occur in service delivery and if it does, it should be instantly recovered to please the consumer. Any unattended service failure may result in causing consumer loss. On the other hand, research suggests that an effectively solved consumer failure experience of a consumer may help in building consumer satisfaction and consumer loyalty and a positive impact of the service provider. It has been established through various research studies that consumers who faced a service failure and were served as per their expectations, were more satisfied and thus, more loyal towards the organization.

 

This concept as referred to as “Service Recovery Paradox”. The concept of Recovery paradox suggests that usually a service failure will result in making the consumer highly dissatisfied. However, if the service failure is recovered and the level of service delivery is more than the expectations of the consumers, the consumer will be highly satisfied. This once dissatisfied consumer is likely to be more loyal and likely to repurchase the service and even highly likely to recommend it to others.

 

Let us discuss an example to understand this concept. You order food at a premium self service restaurant. On being served you find the food stale or may be unhygienic. You angrily complain to the manager. The manager courteously apologies and request you to enjoy a fresh meal being served with few more delicacies added by manager‟s choice, that too, free of cost. How would you react, while leaving the restaurant? It is very likely, you would be a happy consumer while leaving. It is also likely for you to visit the restaurant again and say a friendly hello to the manager. This means that in most of the service failures, if handled well, the consumer could be made loyal to the service provider. Let us assume another example, a customer books a hotel room online and on arrival finds that the same is not available. In order to recover the front desk executive offers him an upgraded room at no extra cost. This makes the customer not only happy but more loyal to the hotel. You should not be surprised, if you find a service provider deliberately planning a service failure and then thrilling the consumer with an over the board service delivery and making him loyal.

 

The concept of Service Recovery Paradox is a complex process. Not all consumers will forget the first bad experience of a service failure, even if they were served well later. This can be explained considering a flight delay of three hours for a business flyer. Even when he is looked after well during the delay, he may still not be very pleased if he had to miss a meeting due to the flight delay. Further, for making a consumer happy while he is complaining would require a very high level of service quality. Moreover, fixing a complaint will require more time and money of the executives. Added to all these would be the loud noise that the sulking consumer will make influencing the perception of the other consumers in the proximity. Therefore, it is important to ensure delivery quality service at the first time. The service personnel must make sure that there is no cause for a service failure.

 

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

 

1.      “A service failure is indispensable.” Do you agree? Why/ Why not?

2.      Define Service Failure, with the help of an example.

3.      What are the causes of Service Failures?

4.      What is Recovery Paradox?

 

1.4 Consumer Reaction to Service Failures

 

In case of a service failure, the consumer may react in a number of ways. A dissatisfied consumer may not take any action in the event of a service failure. If he chooses to take some action it may be of various types.

 

a)  Complain to the Service provider– In case of an action to be initiated by the consumer, in the case of a service failure, the most frequent will be to reach up to the authorities of the service provider and complain to them on the spot. This is an ideal situation for the service provider to respond immediately and do the damage control. This is the situation in which a higher level of service may satisfy the consumer and avoid losing him and also control any negative word of mouth.

 

b)  Spread negative word of mouth– There may be a consumer, who instead of complaining about a service failure, chose to speak bad about the services to his friends nad peers, spreading a negative image of the Service provider. Such a situation is potentially very harmful for the service organization as the firm may not even get to know the root cause of the problem yet face a hostile attitude towards its services.

 

c) Take no action but stop doing business with the service provider– There may be few consumers who may not react following a service failure. They may not complain or speak negative about the service provider. But they may decide never to do business with the service provider again in future. Such a consumer remains silent and does not speak about his negative experience either to the organisation or to the peers, and may simply decide to switch to the competitive Brand. But the service provider looses him as a consumer in future.

 

d) Consumer expectations– In case the service provider is not able to satisfy the consumers as per the service delivery standards expected by the consumer, it is a case of service failure. In such a situation, a dissatisfied consumer expects a decent apology from the service personnel along with an attempt of delivering what was promised with due personal attention. These expectations exist even when the consumer is not verbally complaining.

 

1.5 Service Recovery

 

Service Recovery refers to the attempt of the service provider to manage the service failure causing dissatisfaction to the consumer and ensure quality service delivery. Witnessing a service failure is a very frequent incident in most of the services due to controllable or uncontrollable factors. However, handling such a failure so that the customer is not lost is more crucial. It must be noted that a service recovery action may be initiated not only after a consumer complaint but also by the service personnel themselves, if they feel that they have failed at any level in offering the quality service.

 

1.5.1 Organization’s expected reaction during Service failure

 

In case of a complaint being made by the consumer for a service failure, the following are the expected reactions from the service provider:

 

a) Courteous Confrontation- In the event of a complaint being made by the consumer about a service failure, it is important that the service personnel acknowledges and accepts the complaint in the most courteous and open manner. Any dissent or unwillingness to accept the complaint may lead to a higher level of dissatisfaction amongst the consumer who is already unhappy with the service. The interaction with the consumer at the time of complaint should be made so warm that the complaining consumer is convinced that the service provider is genuinely interested in facilitating the aggrieved consumer on the issue of service failure. The words, the tone and the body language of the service personnel handling the consumer plays an important role in pacifying the complaining consumer.

 

b) Procedure of Service Recovery- For the service provider it is important to seek the details leading to the service failure in order to offer compensation to the consumer. However, the procedure involved in recording the details of the service failure and the steps involved in the offering of the service recovery should be simple and convenient such that the consumer does not get irritated. If a complaining consumer has to follow a complicated and a long process of filing a complaint and getting a compensation, this may further add to his dissatisfaction with the service provider. On the other hand, a swift and simple procedure would be useful in doing the damage control.

 

c) Fair Compensation- Once the service provider is convinced that there has been a service failure, it should not only be quick in offering the compensation but should also offer a compensation which is perceived as worth the inconvenience caused to the consumer due to the service failure. For this, many a times service organizations keep a policy ready for service recovery by laying down the principles according to which the compensation may be offered to the consumers. Policies may be designed keeping in mind the needs of the consumers, consumers past business transactions with the company, extent of consumer inconvenience or damage due to service failure and the financial burden on the organization. Often the consumer would expect an apology, discount, credit or a refund in the event of a service failure. The service provider must identify the consumer expectations and offer a recovery accordingly.

 

 

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

 

5.       What are the common reactions of a consumer on witnessing a Service failure?

6.       Define Service Recovery, with the help of an example.

7.       How should a Service organization face a Service Failure?

8.       What is Fair Compensation?

 

1.5.2 Success of the Service recovery

 

The success of Service failure recovery depends upon three broad factors- the customer relationship and association with the service provider, the damage incurred to the consumer due to the service failure and the perceived level of service quality during the first time. Let us look at these two elements in some detail:

 

a) Customer Association with the Service firm- The reaction of a consumer to a service failure is largely dependent upon the time since the consumer is dealing with the organization. Often the service expectations of a new consumer is high as compared to the one who has been dealing with the organisation since sometime. A new consumer may be looking towards a good deal even in the service recovery else will be quick to switch the service provider. Since, the older consumers had already experienced the service quality, they may be easy to be pleased with eth service recovery efforts due to personal interaction. Consumers who wish to continue dealing with the organization in future would also have lower level of service performance expectations. Service recovery in case of older consumers or in case of consumers wishing to be associated with the organization in future will be easy to satisfy during the service recovery. This is not to suggest that the service personnel should not take the service recovery efforts of an older consumers on a priority, this only suggests that they would be easy to be convinced about the uncontrollable nature of a service failure.

 

b) Damage caused due to Service Failure- While the service organization should immediately spring into action of a service recovery to save a consumer from being lost, the level of satisfaction of the consumer directly depends upon the harm done to the consumer due to the service failure. As discussed above, if a consumer has missed an important meeting or a Conference due to the flight delay with no reasonable excuse, it may be difficult to offer him a convincing service recovery.

 

c) Quality of original Service- Another important aspect of success of service recovery is the quality of the original service being offered. If the level of service performance was really bad the first time, convincing a complaining consumer may only make him less verbal but he may be lost for any future business interactions. This is so because the consumer develops a negative attitude about the service performance standards and thus may not be willing to give it another try and indulges in spreading a bad word of mouth.

 

1.5.3 Service Recovery Management

 

While there is no substitute of „doing it right the first time‟, there should be a mechanism in place for Service recovery in any event of service failure. Consider a situation when you receive a cold soup after a long wait in a restaurant you visit the first time. Will you be disappointed with the service? Surely Yes! Will you complain? May be Yes. Let us further assume that you complain to the service personnel about the cold soup, who courteously takes it back for reheating but does not return back till another twenty minutes. What would be your reaction now? Despite the attempt being made by the serving personnel to recover the service failure, he may still not be able to satisfy you. Hence, it is important not only to have a service recovery mechanism in place in a service organization, but also to manage the recovery so efficiently that the one chance that the service provider has of retaining the consumer is not lost. Here are some of the important measures needed by the organization to have an effective Service recovery plan:

 

a) Have a Feedback receiving desk- For a service manager to ensure that the service is delivered right at the first time, it is important to be alert to any complaint being felt by the consumer. For this, consumer feedback is one of the means. You might have filled some short consumer feedback after being served at Hotels and restaurants like KFC. There may be some locked boxes installed in the vicinity of the consumer to drop in a complaint or any happy or sad experience. Often, the consumer support toll free contact numbers or e-mails ids may also be widely publicized for the purpose of soliciting eth consumer feedback. On receiving encouraging feedbacks, the service manager would be able to assess strengths of service delivery and ensure that the standards of performance are raised further. On evaluating the complaints from the consumers, the service manager will have an opportunity to recover the service and retain the current consumer and to identify the reasons leading to the service failure and ensuring that the same service failure is not repeated in the service production and delivery system.

 

b) Have a Swift Recovery Mechanism- The service manager must develop a quick and simple system of service recovery. The service personnel should be appropriately communicated about the process and duly trained in handling a service failure, quickly and to the level of satisfaction of a complaining consumer. The service personnel must be explained that they would have only one last opportunity to please and retain a consumer in case of a service failure, which may be caused due to any factor. You must have come across the Dominos scheme of getting the ordered pizza free if it is not delivered at consumer‟s ordered address within 30 minutes. Pizza Hut also ran a scheme of “If it is not hot, you get it free” for the home delivered pizza.

 

These are the examples of service recovery mechanisms which have been used as promotional tools by the service sellers.

 

CHECK YOUR PROGRESS

 

9.      On factors does the success of Service recovery depend?

10.  What is the role of original service Quality in Service Recovery?

11.  Is it important to encourage complaint receipt? Why/ Why not?

12.  What is Recovery Paradox?

 

Conclusion

 

While every service provider works to deliver quality service to its consumers in order to sustain and grow, there might be some uncontrollable variables leading to a Service failure. Service failure occurs when the consumer‟s perceived standard of a service performance is much less than the expected standard of service quality. For overcoming the loss of a consumer, it is important for a service organization to quickly confront the service failure and courteously offer a service compensation to the aggrieved consumer which is known as Service Recovery. While there is no denying that service personnel should be well trained to „do it right the first time‟, they should also be trained to handle a complaining consumer effectively, so that neither the consumer indulges in negative word of mouth nor the future business is lost.

 

Summary

 

Every Service provider aims to serve the consumers with the best of their efforts and satisfy them as per their expectations. However, there may be situations in which the consumer is not able to satisfy his needs for which he is paying. There may also be a dissatisfaction amongst the consumers if they do not receive what was promised to them at the time of negotiations. Such a gap in the consumers perception and the actual service delivery is known as Service Failures. Occurrence of a service failure is not uncommon even in old and big service organizations. These may be due to human or technical reasons, which may be controllable or sometimes uncontrollable. An intelligent service provider always develops a mechanism to foresee such a service failure and designs a service recovery mechanism to satisfy the consumer quickly and efficiently so as to retain him. Service Recovery is an attempt by the Service provider to satisfy the complaining consumer by compensating him with something that he values in the most courteous manner. Service personnel should be well trained to handle a service failure and execute a Service Recovery plan to ensure that the consumer is satisfied and retained.

 

Learn More:

 

a) Grainer, M. (2003), Customer care – the multibillion dollar sinkhole: A case of customer rage unassuaged, Alexandria: Customer Care Alliance.

 

b) Homburg, C., Fürst, A. (2007), “See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Speak No Evil: A Study of Defensive Organizational Behavior towards Customer Complaints”, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35, 4, 523-536.

 

c) Homburg, C. and Fuerst, A. (2005), “How Organizational Complaint Handling Drives Customer Loyalty: An Analysis of the Mechanistic and the Organic Approach”, Journal of Marketing, 69(July), 95-114.

 

d) Reichheld, F. F. and Sasser, Jr., W. E. (1990), “Zero defects, quality comes to services,”

Harvard Business Review, 68(September-October), 105-111.

 

e) Tax, S. S. and Brown, S. W. (1998), “Recovering and learning from service failure”, Sloan Management Review, 40(1), 75-88.