{"id":201,"date":"2019-06-10T10:12:56","date_gmt":"2019-06-10T10:12:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=201"},"modified":"2019-06-12T07:02:14","modified_gmt":"2019-06-12T07:02:14","slug":"categories-and-constituents","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/chapter\/categories-and-constituents\/","title":{"rendered":"Categories and Constituents"},"content":{"raw":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/i3tafLKB0Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"49\" height=\"49\" \/><\/a>\r\n<\/span><\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Learning outcome<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this module one is expected to learn the definition of category and various views on how categorization is described by the linguists. Alongside, the notion of part of speech and the short comings of the traditional classification system are shown. The current view about categories and categorization draw much insight from the morphology of a particular language at one hand and syntax on the other.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This idea also has given prominence to the fact that sentences of any language are not mere summation of words. Rather a group of words within a sentence acts like a unit which is called a constituent. Finally, some diagnostic tests are represented to prove the existence of the constituents in natural languages.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This module focuses on categories and constituents as part of the paper 13 e.g. Introduction to Linguistics and Phonetics. These two components are an integral part of Syntax which deals with phrase and clause formations in any language or languages in general. The organization of the module is as the following. At the onset the definitions pertaining to the categories is given in Section 16.1. The idea of category and categorization is discussed in 16.2. Various views on categories are noted in sections 16.2.1-16.2.4. Part of speech and glitches of the traditional part of speech are described in 16.3. Section 16.4 introduces two sets of rules to understand the categories and section 17 narrates the idea of constituents and tests for their identification. Finally, a summary is represented in section 18.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>What is a category?<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">A category is a minimal unit in syntax that selects a particular word or lexical item to be put under it. For example N (oun)s and V(erb)s are called categories as they allow a proper noun or a pronoun to be inserted under the first one and only a verb under the latter.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In other words, a category comprises of a set of features which are responsible for distinguishing the words into the traditional word classes of Noun, Verbs, Adjectives etc. (Adger, 2002).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Category and categorization<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this section, I am going to discuss the process of categorization in human languages and various views about the categories that are an integral part of the human cognition. According to (Rauh, 2010), \u2018Categorizing is a fundamental aspect of how humans process reality and the formation of categories gives structure to the enormous amount of sensory input.\u2019<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Lexical items that share properties are combined into the same category. So a category essentially helps to capture the generalization of a particular type. By this means John, him, assassination would all be classified as nouns and reading, putting and sleeping be classified as verbs. This enables a child to acquire a language effectively and an adult learner to learn a second language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">It is also argued that because of their generalizing properties, categories are indispensable in any area of scientific study. (Rauh, 2010) notes that \u2018forming categories and describing the relations between them\u2019 yields a structure and give us \u2018insights into the object of study.\u2019<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">However, there is no uniformity in the analysis of the categories by linguists. Instead a variety of terminologies can be found including the terms \u2018parts of speech\u2019, \u2018word classes\u2019, \u2018form classes\u2019, \u2018lexical categories\u2019, \u2018grammatical categories\u2019, and \u2018syntactic categories\u2019.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Typological explanations on categories<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Haspelmath, 2001) classifies the Word Classes or the Parts of Speech by listing ten traditional categories, namely Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Pronoun, Preposition\/Ad position, Conjunction, Numeral, Article, and Interjection.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">The term part of speech has originated from Latin \u2018pars orationis\u2019 and often largely used by linguists to denote categories. On the other hand, the term word class was introduced in the first half of the twentieth century by the structural linguists. According to Bloomfield, the term \u2018word class\u2019 refers to the relationship between parts of speech and word classes in the following sense i.e. the maximum quantity of word-classes of a given language are considered as the parts of speech of that language. This simply indicates that the sets of parts of speech and word classes are not identical.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Haspelmath, 2001) argues that the dispute arises due to the confusion between these terminologies. What one needs to understand is that not every language shows equal number of word class or part of speech. Some languages will have more of them compared to the others.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">The generalization can be captured as the following<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Not every language will have the same ten categories as noted by (Haspelmath, 2001). This means that in many languages distinguishing the Nouns from the adjectives or adjectives from the verbs would be difficult.<\/li>\r\n \t<li class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">\u00a0Many languages will have categories other than those ten traditional categories and without describing these unique categories, the grammatical descriptions of these languages will not be exhaustive.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Under this view, \u2018word class\u2019, \u2018part of speech\u2019, \u2018syntactic category\u2019, and \u2018lexical category\u2019 are equivalent or at least \u2018roughly equivalent\u2019, and they are synonymous or near-synonymous.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Syntactic views on categories<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In terms of the Chomskyan linguistics categories are considered as \u2018syntactic categories\u2019 albeit technically this refers not only to lexical categories such as nouns and verbs but also to phrasal categories such as noun phrases and verb phrases).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Syntacticians primarily distinguish categories into lexical categories e.g. noun, verb, and adjective (e.g. Chomsky 1981: 48; Baker 2003); noun, verb, adjective, and preposition (postposition) (e.g. Chomsky 1986a: 160; Chomsky 1986b: 2; Haegeman 1994:146;Wunderlich 1996: 2); or noun, verb, adjective, adverb, and preposition (e.g. Radford 1997: 37 f; Haegeman and Gue\u00b4ron 1999: 58) as compared to the functional categories, which include complementizers, determiners, pronouns, and auxiliaries (cf. e.g. Radford 1997b: 45) as cited in (Rauh, 2010).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(Lyons, 1966) characterizes categories in favour of a \u2018form-class\u2019 \u2018in terms of its syntactic equivalence\u2019. He simply states<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\u201cTwo forms, fi and fj, are members of the same form-class Fx if and only if they are intersubstitutable (i.e. have the same distribution) throughout the sentences of the language.\u201d<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Consider the following examples:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>John is a doctor (if we substitute John with Bill then we get 2)<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Bill is a doctor<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Now John and Bill would form the same form class namely N(oun) because they can be interchangeably placed in English.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Cognitive approaches to categorization<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Cognitive psychologist Rosch (e.g. 1973a,b, 1977a,b, 1978; Rosch and Mervis 1975) as cited in (Rauh, 2010) postulates \u2018a different basis for the human categorization of the real world.\u2019 She claims that the cognitive categories do not correspond to a set of entities featuring identical properties. They tend to exhibit a prototype structure. For example according to this theory Bird is a prototype that would cover all the names of the birds in a given language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Rosch and Mervis (1975 cited in (Rauh, 2010) calls this a \u2018family resemblance\u2019 and the idea is based on Wittgenstein\u2019s statements on categorial structures and the relationship between members of a category (1953 [2001]: 27e f.). \u2018Family resemblance\u2019 simply denotes that the entities may share several or only one property with each other and\/or with the prototype, but that they do not share all the relevant properties.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Combinatorial approach<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Taylor, 1995) takes a combinatorial path in the sense he considers the categorial structure of the \u2018grammatical categories\u2019 include \u2018word classes \u2013 the traditional parts of speech\u2019 and \u2018syntactic categories like noun phrase\u2019. He proposes grammatical categories have \u2018a prototype structure, with central members sharing a range of both syntactic and semantic attributes\u2019. Following the prototype theory, other category members may then share properties either with the core members or with one another, but they need not require exhibiting all the properties of the core members.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Consider examples from English:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">1) John is playing football.\r\n2) Samir\u2019s uncle is sleeping.\r\n3) The destruction of the city is farfetched.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">All the bold items belong to a single proto type Noun because they share at least one property. John and Samir\u2019s uncle both refer to some person in this world. Similarly destruction would also fall into the same prototype as it refers to an action and according to the morphology of English suffix \u2013ion turns a verb into a noun. In the following section, traditional notions of categories are taken up and the problems pertaining to this classification is discussed.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Part of Speech<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">According to (Carnie, 2002) part of speech acts like \u2018how a word is going to function in the sentence.\u2019 The most common parts of speech discussed in descriptive grammars are nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs and prepositions. This triggers a pertinent question as in how do we classify them? Often the traditional definitions will fail to account for certain classifications. Consider the following examples:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">4) The assassination of the prime minister\r\n5) Singing is a quality.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">These two underlined words cannot be classified as nouns if we delimit our notion of nouns as name of place, object or a thing. (Carnie, 2002) argues that semantic criteria often inadequately captured part of speech. Consider the example from Bangla.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">6) Choto-Ta douro-cch-e Small-CLF run-HAB.PRS-3P \u2018The small one is running.\u2019<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Normally, we expect to see nouns occupying the subject position. In 6) instead of a noun an adjective has occupied the nominal position and it indicates that a word might change its category depending upon the position that it is going to occupy in a sentence.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Based on these examples syntacticians propose a distributional criteria for identifying the part of speech. The criteria comprises of morphological distribution and syntactic distribution. The first refers to the morphological marking namely the affixes that appear with a particular word help to identify that word. For example suffix \u2013ing in English can either appear as a derivational morpheme or as an inflectional morpheme. However, their categorial nature will be ultimately decided based on their occurrence in a sentence. If singing appears at the beginning of a sentence then it is highly likely that it is going to act like a derived nominal or gerund as show in 5) above. However if it appears after a subject then it shows up as a verb as in 7).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">7) Rakhi was singing.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Classification of the major part of speech based on morphology and syntax (Carnie, 2002)<\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\"><strong>POS<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\"><strong>Morphological distribution<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\"><strong>Syntactic distribution<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Nouns<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>ment (basement), -ness (friendliness), -ity (sincerity), -ty (certainty),<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-(t)ion (devotion), -ation (expectation), - ist (specialist), -ant (attendant)<\/em><\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">often\u00a0\u00a0 appear\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 after\u00a0\u00a0 determiners such as the,<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">those, these, (e.g., these peanuts\/ yeh kitabe \u2018these books\u2019) and can<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-s (cats), -es (glasses), -en (oxen), -ren<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>(children), -i (cacti), -a (addenda)<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi -e as in larke (boys)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">appear after adjectives (the big peanut)\/ woh lal topi \u2018the red cap\u2019.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Nouns can also follow prepositions (in school)\u00a0 or precede post positions (school se \u2018from school\u2019).<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Verbs<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>derivational endings such as -ate (dissipate), and -ize\/-ise (regularize)<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ed or -t ending for past.<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>In the present tense, third person\u00a0 singular (he, she, it), they take the -s ending.<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi, gender and person marking Larka jat-<strong>a <\/strong>he \u2018boy goes\u2019<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Larki jat-<strong>i <\/strong>he \u2018girl goes\u2019<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Verbs can follow auxiliaries and modals such as <em>will,<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>have, having, had, has, am, be, been, being, is, are, were, was, would, can, could,<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>shall, should, <\/em>and the special infinitive marker <em>to<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Hindi,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 verbs\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 can\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 follow negation<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">me khana nehi <strong>khaunga \u2018<\/strong>I will not eat\u2019<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Adjectives<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>derivational endings such as<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ing (the dancing cat), -ive (indicative), - able (readable), -al (traditional), -ate (intimate),<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ish (childish), -some (tiresome), -(i)an (reptilian), -ful (wishful), -less<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>(selfless), -ly (friendly). -er and \u2013est as in happier and happiest<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi wala or wali is added with an adjective<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">hariwali chatni (green chatney) nimbuwali chay (lemon tea) khanewala admi (food loving person)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Adjectives can appear between determiners such as<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>the, a, these <\/em>etc. and nouns: (<em>the big peanut<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">yeh <strong>bara <\/strong>talav (Hindi) \u2018this big lake\u2019<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Adverbs<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>adverbs end in -ly: quickly, frequently<\/em><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Indian languages adverbs are often reduplicated \u2013 dhire dhire (slowly slowly)<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The syntactic distribution of adverbs is most easily described by stating where they can\u2019t appear. Adverbs can\u2019t appear between<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">a determiner and a noun (*<em>the quickly fox<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">* woh jaldi billi \u2018that quickly cat\u2019<\/p>\r\n<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Categories or part of speech take part in the formation of phrases and sentences. In the next section, I am going to explain two sets of rules proposed by (Bhatt, 2008) to understand the categories in terms of sentence formation in a language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Two sets of rules for categories<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Phrase structure rules involve categorizations i.e. these rules can either generate a category from another category or they may simply allow the categories to be filled in by the lexical items. Essentially then it predicts that a grammar of any language is a combination of these Categorial rules and Lexical rules.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 99.8788%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\"><strong>Categorial rules<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\"><strong>Lexical rules<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">S-&gt; NP (aux) VP<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">N-&gt; girl, boy , John<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">NP-&gt; (Det) (AdjP) N (PP)<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">V -&gt; see, like, sleep<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">VP-&gt; V (NP) (PP)(Advp)<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Adj-&gt;big, red<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">Adjp-&gt; (Adjp) Adj<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Adv-&gt; quickly<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">Advp-&gt; Adv<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Aux-&gt; am, can<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">PP-&gt; P(NP)<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">P-&gt; to, from<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Det&gt; this, the<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\nSome of the sentences in English that these rules will generate can be seen as under:\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n1) The girl likes\r\n\r\n2) The big boy is\r\n\r\n3) John is coming from School\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">What is observed in 8)-10) that these sentences are not mere summation of lexical items. Words have been selected by categories and these categories are combined hierarchically. This hierarchy is explained through a technical notion in syntax known as constituents.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>\u00a0Constituent<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As (Carnie, 2002) puts it a Constituent <em>is a group of words that functions together as a unit<\/em>. In example 8) above, we can see that \u2018<em>the\u2019 <\/em>and <em>\u2018girl\u2019 <\/em>are closely related and they are capable of forming one unit. Likewise <em>likes <\/em>and <em>John <\/em>combine as a unit; john being the direct object of the verb. Let me show this structure in terms of a syntactic tree in 11).<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">In order to determine the constituents (Bhatt, 2008) formulates the following principle:<\/div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">\u00a0A set of nodes can combine into a unit called as constituent a common node exhaustively dominates them.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0A is a constituent of B if B dominates A.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">From 11) it can be said that a sentence is a highest level constituent noted here as S. S comprises of two constituents i.e. an NP and a VP. In turn the subject NP constituent is formed by combining two categories that is a determiner and a noun. The VP comprises of a category and another NP constituent.<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Constituency tests<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In the section above we noted that a set of nodes that are dominated by a single node is known as constituency. Thus NP,VP, ADjP, AdvP and PPs are all called constituents and these\u00a0 constituents in various combinations ultimately form a bigger constituent known as S or sentence.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Now we turn to a discussion which will focus on how to decide a combination of nodes as a constituent. These tests are noted as tests for constituency.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Replacement test<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be replaced by single word or lexical item then the group of words will qualify as a constituent. This test is called as replacement test.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0The big red balloon is flying high in the sky.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0It is flying high in the sky.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Since It can replace the entire unit The big red balloon in 12) the unit stand as a constituent namely an NP constituent.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Stand alone or fragment test<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be produced as an answer to a question, then that group of words can form one constituent.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>John ate at the rooftop view restaurant.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>Where did John eat?<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">The answer to 15) will be ate at the rooftop view restaurant but not *ate at or *ate at the. Hence, we can clearly say that at the rooftop view restaurant is a constituent.<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Movement test<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group of words can be moved within a sentence then that will confirm the group as a constituent. There are three kinds of movement tests. i) Clefting which involves putting a string of words between It was (or It is) and a that at the beginning of the sentence.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Mohan bought a new shirt<\/li>\r\n \t<li>It is a new shirt that Mohan bought.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">ii) Preposing or the so called pseudoclefting) involves putting the string of words before a is\/are what or is\/are who at the front of the sentence.<\/div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0A new shirt, Mohan bought.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div>iii) Constituency hood can also be attested through passivization. In case of passives the subject NP and the object NP interchange positions and it can establish them as constituents.<\/div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0A new shirt was bought by Mohan.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Ellipsis test<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\">Ellipsis test is widely used for the constituency hood of the VP. In this test, the VP is dropped from the second clause and replaced with did too\/so. That is the reason this test is also called as did so test.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>Subbarao went to the shop and Mohanty did it too(went to the shop).<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0Sita- ne ram ko bulawa aur gopi-ne vi (ram ko bulawa)<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div>Sita-ERG Ram-ACC called and Gopi-ERG too \u2018Sita called ram and Gopi did so too.\u2019<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Coordination test<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Coordinate structures are constituents linked by a conjunction like and or or. Only constituents of the same syntactic category can be conjoined e.g. an NP can be conjoined with another NP and a VP with a VP but say not with an AdjP.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0[The woman] and [the man] went to the shop yesterday.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0The woman [went to the shop] and [bought ice creams].<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0[The woman] and [*the grey] went to the shop yesterday.<\/li>\r\n \t<li>\u00a0[The woman] went to the shop and [*the purple].<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Summary<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this module categories and the constituents which are considered as the objects of syntax (phrase and clause formation) are discussed.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A category is a minimal unit in syntax that selects a particular word or lexical item to be put under it.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Lexical items that share properties are combined into the same category.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">According to the typologists Parts of Speech comprises of ten traditional categories, namely Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Pronoun, Preposition\/Ad position, Conjunction, Numeral, Article, and Interjection.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Syntacticians primarily distinguish categories into lexical categories e.g. noun, verb, preposition and adjective.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Cognitive view on categories entails that categories correspond to a set of entities featuring identical properties and they tend to exhibit a prototype structure.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Part of speech acts like how a word is going to function in the sentence.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The current argument shows that the categories can be identified in terms of their morphological and syntactic distribution in a language.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Two sets of rules in grammar can explain the categories, categorial rules and lexical rules.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A constituent is a group of words that functions together as a unit. NP,VP, ADjP, AdvP and PPs are all called constituents.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be replaced by single word or lexical item then the group of words will qualify as a constituent. This test is called as replacement test.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be produced as an answer to a question, then that group of words can form one constituent.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">In case a group of words can be moved within a sentence then that will confirm the group as a constituent. iii) Constituency hood can also be attested through passivization.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Ellipsis test is widely used for the constituency hood of the VP. In this test, the VP is dropped from the second clause and replaced with did so too.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Coordinate structures are constituents linked by a conjunction like and or or. Only constituents of the same syntactic category can be conjoined.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>you can view video on Categories and Constituents<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/i3tafLKB0Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<strong>Reference<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Adger, D. (2002). <em>Core Syntax: A minimalist approach.<\/em><\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Bhatt, R. (2008). <em>Pharse Structure rules, Tree rewriting and recursion. <\/em>Amherst: UMASS. Carnie, A. (2002). <em>Syntax: A Generative Introduction. <\/em>Wiley-Blackwell.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Haspelmath, M. (2001). Word Classes and Parts of Speech. <em>International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral<\/em>, 16538-45.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Lyons, J. (1966). Towards a \u2018\u2018Notional\u2019\u2019 Theory of the \u2018\u2018Parts of Speech\u2019\u2019 . <em>Journal of Linguistics 2:<\/em>, 209\u201336.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Rauh, G. (2010). <em>Syntactic Categories. <\/em>Oxford University Press.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Taylor, J. R. (1995). <em>Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. <\/em>Oxford: Clarendon Press.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>","rendered":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/i3tafLKB0Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"49\" height=\"49\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Learning outcome<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this module one is expected to learn the definition of category and various views on how categorization is described by the linguists. Alongside, the notion of part of speech and the short comings of the traditional classification system are shown. The current view about categories and categorization draw much insight from the morphology of a particular language at one hand and syntax on the other.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This idea also has given prominence to the fact that sentences of any language are not mere summation of words. Rather a group of words within a sentence acts like a unit which is called a constituent. Finally, some diagnostic tests are represented to prove the existence of the constituents in natural languages.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This module focuses on categories and constituents as part of the paper 13 e.g. Introduction to Linguistics and Phonetics. These two components are an integral part of Syntax which deals with phrase and clause formations in any language or languages in general. The organization of the module is as the following. At the onset the definitions pertaining to the categories is given in Section 16.1. The idea of category and categorization is discussed in 16.2. Various views on categories are noted in sections 16.2.1-16.2.4. Part of speech and glitches of the traditional part of speech are described in 16.3. Section 16.4 introduces two sets of rules to understand the categories and section 17 narrates the idea of constituents and tests for their identification. Finally, a summary is represented in section 18.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>What is a category?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">A category is a minimal unit in syntax that selects a particular word or lexical item to be put under it. For example N (oun)s and V(erb)s are called categories as they allow a proper noun or a pronoun to be inserted under the first one and only a verb under the latter.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In other words, a category comprises of a set of features which are responsible for distinguishing the words into the traditional word classes of Noun, Verbs, Adjectives etc. (Adger, 2002).<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Category and categorization<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this section, I am going to discuss the process of categorization in human languages and various views about the categories that are an integral part of the human cognition. According to (Rauh, 2010), \u2018Categorizing is a fundamental aspect of how humans process reality and the formation of categories gives structure to the enormous amount of sensory input.\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Lexical items that share properties are combined into the same category. So a category essentially helps to capture the generalization of a particular type. By this means John, him, assassination would all be classified as nouns and reading, putting and sleeping be classified as verbs. This enables a child to acquire a language effectively and an adult learner to learn a second language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">It is also argued that because of their generalizing properties, categories are indispensable in any area of scientific study. (Rauh, 2010) notes that \u2018forming categories and describing the relations between them\u2019 yields a structure and give us \u2018insights into the object of study.\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">However, there is no uniformity in the analysis of the categories by linguists. Instead a variety of terminologies can be found including the terms \u2018parts of speech\u2019, \u2018word classes\u2019, \u2018form classes\u2019, \u2018lexical categories\u2019, \u2018grammatical categories\u2019, and \u2018syntactic categories\u2019.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Typological explanations on categories<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Haspelmath, 2001) classifies the Word Classes or the Parts of Speech by listing ten traditional categories, namely Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Pronoun, Preposition\/Ad position, Conjunction, Numeral, Article, and Interjection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">The term part of speech has originated from Latin \u2018pars orationis\u2019 and often largely used by linguists to denote categories. On the other hand, the term word class was introduced in the first half of the twentieth century by the structural linguists. According to Bloomfield, the term \u2018word class\u2019 refers to the relationship between parts of speech and word classes in the following sense i.e. the maximum quantity of word-classes of a given language are considered as the parts of speech of that language. This simply indicates that the sets of parts of speech and word classes are not identical.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Haspelmath, 2001) argues that the dispute arises due to the confusion between these terminologies. What one needs to understand is that not every language shows equal number of word class or part of speech. Some languages will have more of them compared to the others.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">The generalization can be captured as the following<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Not every language will have the same ten categories as noted by (Haspelmath, 2001). This means that in many languages distinguishing the Nouns from the adjectives or adjectives from the verbs would be difficult.<\/li>\n<li class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">\u00a0Many languages will have categories other than those ten traditional categories and without describing these unique categories, the grammatical descriptions of these languages will not be exhaustive.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Under this view, \u2018word class\u2019, \u2018part of speech\u2019, \u2018syntactic category\u2019, and \u2018lexical category\u2019 are equivalent or at least \u2018roughly equivalent\u2019, and they are synonymous or near-synonymous.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Syntactic views on categories<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In terms of the Chomskyan linguistics categories are considered as \u2018syntactic categories\u2019 albeit technically this refers not only to lexical categories such as nouns and verbs but also to phrasal categories such as noun phrases and verb phrases).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Syntacticians primarily distinguish categories into lexical categories e.g. noun, verb, and adjective (e.g. Chomsky 1981: 48; Baker 2003); noun, verb, adjective, and preposition (postposition) (e.g. Chomsky 1986a: 160; Chomsky 1986b: 2; Haegeman 1994:146;Wunderlich 1996: 2); or noun, verb, adjective, adverb, and preposition (e.g. Radford 1997: 37 f; Haegeman and Gue\u00b4ron 1999: 58) as compared to the functional categories, which include complementizers, determiners, pronouns, and auxiliaries (cf. e.g. Radford 1997b: 45) as cited in (Rauh, 2010).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">(Lyons, 1966) characterizes categories in favour of a \u2018form-class\u2019 \u2018in terms of its syntactic equivalence\u2019. He simply states<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\u201cTwo forms, fi and fj, are members of the same form-class Fx if and only if they are intersubstitutable (i.e. have the same distribution) throughout the sentences of the language.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Consider the following examples:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>John is a doctor (if we substitute John with Bill then we get 2)<\/li>\n<li>Bill is a doctor<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Now John and Bill would form the same form class namely N(oun) because they can be interchangeably placed in English.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Cognitive approaches to categorization<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Cognitive psychologist Rosch (e.g. 1973a,b, 1977a,b, 1978; Rosch and Mervis 1975) as cited in (Rauh, 2010) postulates \u2018a different basis for the human categorization of the real world.\u2019 She claims that the cognitive categories do not correspond to a set of entities featuring identical properties. They tend to exhibit a prototype structure. For example according to this theory Bird is a prototype that would cover all the names of the birds in a given language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Rosch and Mervis (1975 cited in (Rauh, 2010) calls this a \u2018family resemblance\u2019 and the idea is based on Wittgenstein\u2019s statements on categorial structures and the relationship between members of a category (1953 [2001]: 27e f.). \u2018Family resemblance\u2019 simply denotes that the entities may share several or only one property with each other and\/or with the prototype, but that they do not share all the relevant properties.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Combinatorial approach<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">(Taylor, 1995) takes a combinatorial path in the sense he considers the categorial structure of the \u2018grammatical categories\u2019 include \u2018word classes \u2013 the traditional parts of speech\u2019 and \u2018syntactic categories like noun phrase\u2019. He proposes grammatical categories have \u2018a prototype structure, with central members sharing a range of both syntactic and semantic attributes\u2019. Following the prototype theory, other category members may then share properties either with the core members or with one another, but they need not require exhibiting all the properties of the core members.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Consider examples from English:<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">1) John is playing football.<br \/>\n2) Samir\u2019s uncle is sleeping.<br \/>\n3) The destruction of the city is farfetched.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">All the bold items belong to a single proto type Noun because they share at least one property. John and Samir\u2019s uncle both refer to some person in this world. Similarly destruction would also fall into the same prototype as it refers to an action and according to the morphology of English suffix \u2013ion turns a verb into a noun. In the following section, traditional notions of categories are taken up and the problems pertaining to this classification is discussed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Part of Speech<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">According to (Carnie, 2002) part of speech acts like \u2018how a word is going to function in the sentence.\u2019 The most common parts of speech discussed in descriptive grammars are nouns, verbs, adjectives, adverbs and prepositions. This triggers a pertinent question as in how do we classify them? Often the traditional definitions will fail to account for certain classifications. Consider the following examples:<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">4) The assassination of the prime minister<br \/>\n5) Singing is a quality.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">These two underlined words cannot be classified as nouns if we delimit our notion of nouns as name of place, object or a thing. (Carnie, 2002) argues that semantic criteria often inadequately captured part of speech. Consider the example from Bangla.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">6) Choto-Ta douro-cch-e Small-CLF run-HAB.PRS-3P \u2018The small one is running.\u2019<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Normally, we expect to see nouns occupying the subject position. In 6) instead of a noun an adjective has occupied the nominal position and it indicates that a word might change its category depending upon the position that it is going to occupy in a sentence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Based on these examples syntacticians propose a distributional criteria for identifying the part of speech. The criteria comprises of morphological distribution and syntactic distribution. The first refers to the morphological marking namely the affixes that appear with a particular word help to identify that word. For example suffix \u2013ing in English can either appear as a derivational morpheme or as an inflectional morpheme. However, their categorial nature will be ultimately decided based on their occurrence in a sentence. If singing appears at the beginning of a sentence then it is highly likely that it is going to act like a derived nominal or gerund as show in 5) above. However if it appears after a subject then it shows up as a verb as in 7).<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">7) Rakhi was singing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Classification of the major part of speech based on morphology and syntax (Carnie, 2002)<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\"><strong>POS<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\"><strong>Morphological distribution<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\"><strong>Syntactic distribution<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Nouns<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>ment (basement), -ness (friendliness), -ity (sincerity), -ty (certainty),<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-(t)ion (devotion), -ation (expectation), &#8211; ist (specialist), -ant (attendant)<\/em><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">often\u00a0\u00a0 appear\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 after\u00a0\u00a0 determiners such as the,<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">those, these, (e.g., these peanuts\/ yeh kitabe \u2018these books\u2019) and can<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-s (cats), -es (glasses), -en (oxen), -ren<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>(children), -i (cacti), -a (addenda)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi -e as in larke (boys)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">appear after adjectives (the big peanut)\/ woh lal topi \u2018the red cap\u2019.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Nouns can also follow prepositions (in school)\u00a0 or precede post positions (school se \u2018from school\u2019).<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Verbs<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>derivational endings such as -ate (dissipate), and -ize\/-ise (regularize)<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ed or -t ending for past.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>In the present tense, third person\u00a0 singular (he, she, it), they take the -s ending.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi, gender and person marking Larka jat-<strong>a <\/strong>he \u2018boy goes\u2019<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Larki jat-<strong>i <\/strong>he \u2018girl goes\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Verbs can follow auxiliaries and modals such as <em>will,<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>have, having, had, has, am, be, been, being, is, are, were, was, would, can, could,<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>shall, should, <\/em>and the special infinitive marker <em>to<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Hindi,\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 verbs\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 can\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 follow negation<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">me khana nehi <strong>khaunga \u2018<\/strong>I will not eat\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Adjectives<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>derivational endings such as<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ing (the dancing cat), -ive (indicative), &#8211; able (readable), -al (traditional), -ate (intimate),<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>-ish (childish), -some (tiresome), -(i)an (reptilian), -ful (wishful), -less<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>(selfless), -ly (friendly). -er and \u2013est as in happier and happiest<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Hindi wala or wali is added with an adjective<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">hariwali chatni (green chatney) nimbuwali chay (lemon tea) khanewala admi (food loving person)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Adjectives can appear between determiners such as<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>the, a, these <\/em>etc. and nouns: (<em>the big peanut<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">yeh <strong>bara <\/strong>talav (Hindi) \u2018this big lake\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 43.5152%\">Adverbs<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 44.6061%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\"><em>adverbs end in -ly: quickly, frequently<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">In Indian languages adverbs are often reduplicated \u2013 dhire dhire (slowly slowly)<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The syntactic distribution of adverbs is most easily described by stating where they can\u2019t appear. Adverbs can\u2019t appear between<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">a determiner and a noun (*<em>the quickly fox<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">* woh jaldi billi \u2018that quickly cat\u2019<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Categories or part of speech take part in the formation of phrases and sentences. In the next section, I am going to explain two sets of rules proposed by (Bhatt, 2008) to understand the categories in terms of sentence formation in a language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Two sets of rules for categories<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Phrase structure rules involve categorizations i.e. these rules can either generate a category from another category or they may simply allow the categories to be filled in by the lexical items. Essentially then it predicts that a grammar of any language is a combination of these Categorial rules and Lexical rules.<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 99.8788%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\"><strong>Categorial rules<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\"><strong>Lexical rules<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">S-&gt; NP (aux) VP<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">N-&gt; girl, boy , John<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">NP-&gt; (Det) (AdjP) N (PP)<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">V -&gt; see, like, sleep<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">VP-&gt; V (NP) (PP)(Advp)<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Adj-&gt;big, red<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">Adjp-&gt; (Adjp) Adj<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Adv-&gt; quickly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">Advp-&gt; Adv<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Aux-&gt; am, can<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\">PP-&gt; P(NP)<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">P-&gt; to, from<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 53.8182%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 46.0606%\">Det&gt; this, the<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>Some of the sentences in English that these rules will generate can be seen as under:<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>1) The girl likes<\/p>\n<p>2) The big boy is<\/p>\n<p>3) John is coming from School<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">What is observed in 8)-10) that these sentences are not mere summation of lexical items. Words have been selected by categories and these categories are combined hierarchically. This hierarchy is explained through a technical notion in syntax known as constituents.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>\u00a0Constituent<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As (Carnie, 2002) puts it a Constituent <em>is a group of words that functions together as a unit<\/em>. In example 8) above, we can see that \u2018<em>the\u2019 <\/em>and <em>\u2018girl\u2019 <\/em>are closely related and they are capable of forming one unit. Likewise <em>likes <\/em>and <em>John <\/em>combine as a unit; john being the direct object of the verb. Let me show this structure in terms of a syntactic tree in 11).<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">In order to determine the constituents (Bhatt, 2008) formulates the following principle:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">\u00a0A set of nodes can combine into a unit called as constituent a common node exhaustively dominates them.<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0A is a constituent of B if B dominates A.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">From 11) it can be said that a sentence is a highest level constituent noted here as S. S comprises of two constituents i.e. an NP and a VP. In turn the subject NP constituent is formed by combining two categories that is a determiner and a noun. The VP comprises of a category and another NP constituent.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Constituency tests<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In the section above we noted that a set of nodes that are dominated by a single node is known as constituency. Thus NP,VP, ADjP, AdvP and PPs are all called constituents and these\u00a0 constituents in various combinations ultimately form a bigger constituent known as S or sentence.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Now we turn to a discussion which will focus on how to decide a combination of nodes as a constituent. These tests are noted as tests for constituency.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Replacement test<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be replaced by single word or lexical item then the group of words will qualify as a constituent. This test is called as replacement test.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u00a0The big red balloon is flying high in the sky.<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0It is flying high in the sky.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Since It can replace the entire unit The big red balloon in 12) the unit stand as a constituent namely an NP constituent.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Stand alone or fragment test<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be produced as an answer to a question, then that group of words can form one constituent.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>John ate at the rooftop view restaurant.<\/li>\n<li>Where did John eat?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">The answer to 15) will be ate at the rooftop view restaurant but not *ate at or *ate at the. Hence, we can clearly say that at the rooftop view restaurant is a constituent.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Movement test<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group of words can be moved within a sentence then that will confirm the group as a constituent. There are three kinds of movement tests. i) Clefting which involves putting a string of words between It was (or It is) and a that at the beginning of the sentence.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Mohan bought a new shirt<\/li>\n<li>It is a new shirt that Mohan bought.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">ii) Preposing or the so called pseudoclefting) involves putting the string of words before a is\/are what or is\/are who at the front of the sentence.<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li>\u00a0A new shirt, Mohan bought.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div>iii) Constituency hood can also be attested through passivization. In case of passives the subject NP and the object NP interchange positions and it can establish them as constituents.<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li>\u00a0A new shirt was bought by Mohan.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div><\/div>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Ellipsis test<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\">Ellipsis test is widely used for the constituency hood of the VP. In this test, the VP is dropped from the second clause and replaced with did too\/so. That is the reason this test is also called as did so test.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Subbarao went to the shop and Mohanty did it too(went to the shop).<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0Sita- ne ram ko bulawa aur gopi-ne vi (ram ko bulawa)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div>Sita-ERG Ram-ACC called and Gopi-ERG too \u2018Sita called ram and Gopi did so too.\u2019<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Coordination test<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Coordinate structures are constituents linked by a conjunction like and or or. Only constituents of the same syntactic category can be conjoined e.g. an NP can be conjoined with another NP and a VP with a VP but say not with an AdjP.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>\u00a0[The woman] and [the man] went to the shop yesterday.<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0The woman [went to the shop] and [bought ice creams].<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0[The woman] and [*the grey] went to the shop yesterday.<\/li>\n<li>\u00a0[The woman] went to the shop and [*the purple].<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In this module categories and the constituents which are considered as the objects of syntax (phrase and clause formation) are discussed.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A category is a minimal unit in syntax that selects a particular word or lexical item to be put under it.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Lexical items that share properties are combined into the same category.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">According to the typologists Parts of Speech comprises of ten traditional categories, namely Noun, Verb, Adjective, Adverb, Pronoun, Preposition\/Ad position, Conjunction, Numeral, Article, and Interjection.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Syntacticians primarily distinguish categories into lexical categories e.g. noun, verb, preposition and adjective.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Cognitive view on categories entails that categories correspond to a set of entities featuring identical properties and they tend to exhibit a prototype structure.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Part of speech acts like how a word is going to function in the sentence.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The current argument shows that the categories can be identified in terms of their morphological and syntactic distribution in a language.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Two sets of rules in grammar can explain the categories, categorial rules and lexical rules.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A constituent is a group of words that functions together as a unit. NP,VP, ADjP, AdvP and PPs are all called constituents.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be replaced by single word or lexical item then the group of words will qualify as a constituent. This test is called as replacement test.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">If a group words can be produced as an answer to a question, then that group of words can form one constituent.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">In case a group of words can be moved within a sentence then that will confirm the group as a constituent. iii) Constituency hood can also be attested through passivization.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Ellipsis test is widely used for the constituency hood of the VP. In this test, the VP is dropped from the second clause and replaced with did so too.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Coordinate structures are constituents linked by a conjunction like and or or. Only constituents of the same syntactic category can be conjoined.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>you can view video on Categories and Constituents<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/i3tafLKB0Aw\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Adger, D. (2002). <em>Core Syntax: A minimalist approach.<\/em><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Bhatt, R. (2008). <em>Pharse Structure rules, Tree rewriting and recursion. <\/em>Amherst: UMASS. Carnie, A. (2002). <em>Syntax: A Generative Introduction. <\/em>Wiley-Blackwell.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Haspelmath, M. (2001). Word Classes and Parts of Speech. <em>International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral<\/em>, 16538-45.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Lyons, J. (1966). Towards a \u2018\u2018Notional\u2019\u2019 Theory of the \u2018\u2018Parts of Speech\u2019\u2019 . <em>Journal of Linguistics 2:<\/em>, 209\u201336.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Rauh, G. (2010). <em>Syntactic Categories. <\/em>Oxford University Press.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Taylor, J. R. (1995). <em>Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. <\/em>Oxford: Clarendon Press.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"menu_order":16,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["dr-atunu-saha"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[65],"license":[],"class_list":["post-201","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-dr-atunu-saha"],"part":3,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/201","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/201\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":494,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/201\/revisions\/494"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/201\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=201"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=201"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=201"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=201"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}