{"id":192,"date":"2019-06-10T09:29:56","date_gmt":"2019-06-10T09:29:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/?post_type=chapter&#038;p=192"},"modified":"2019-06-12T06:07:38","modified_gmt":"2019-06-12T06:07:38","slug":"morpho-phonemics","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/chapter\/morpho-phonemics\/","title":{"rendered":"Morpho-phonemics"},"content":{"raw":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/GHnFhiqs8sU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"51\" height=\"51\" \/><\/a>\r\n<\/span><\/div>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Learning Outcomes:<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">After the completion of this module, the students would gain an insight into the key concepts of English morphophonemics. Students would be able to understand how morphological structure of a morpheme may affect pronunciation or phonological shape of following or preceding morphemes.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This chapter presents an introduction to English morphophonemics. Sound structure (phonology) and word structure (morphology) are two of the main components of a language system. However, many a times, these systems interact and affect each other in some interesting ways and give rise to a phenomenon which is known as \u2018morphophonemics\u2019 Sometimes, due to this interaction, pronunciation of a morpheme may get modified or completely changed. These changes may be regular or irregular and usually are context sensitive in nature. In \u2018morphophonemics\u2019, we specifically study the changes which occur at the margins\/boundaries of morphemes. There are many glossaries, lectures, notes and other reference materials available over the internet for further studies in this area. Some of the pioneer reference works are also listed in the reference section.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: In this module, IPA transcriptions of morphemes\/words have been throughout referred from Cambridge Online dictionary.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In his book titled \u2018A Manual Of Phonology\u2019 Charles F. Hockett, Professor of linguistics and anthropology, says that language is nothing but a complex system of habits and this system can be broken down and categorized into five principle subsystems:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">1. The phonological system: refers to the stock of phonemes and the systematic arrangements in which these phonemes occur in a language;<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">2. The grammatical system: refers to the stock of morphemes, the systematic arrangements in which these morphemes occur in a language;<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">3. The morphophonemic system: refers to the relational code that ties phonological and grammatical system together.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">4. The semantic system: refers to the association of morphemes, combinations of morphemes, and the systematic arrangements in which morphemes can be put, with things and situations, or kinds of things and situations.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">5. The phonetic system: refers to the process in which phonemes, sequences of phonemes of are converted into sound waves\/speech signals by a speaker, and these sound waves\/speech are then decoded from by a hearer.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Of these five principle subsystems, 1 to 3 are central, while 4-5 seem to be peripheral in nature to the language as a system. In this chapter, our main focus will be on 3 \u2018The morphophonemic system\u2019 and this focus will further be limited to scope in that examples and discussions will be revolve around morphophonemic system of English language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Morphophonemics<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Morphophonemics may be defined as analysis and classification of the phonological factors which affect the pronunciation of morphemes or, correspondingly, the morphological factors which affect the appearance of phonemes. In morphophonemics, we basically study interaction between morphological and phonological processes and how they these factors affect each other. Morphophonemic change usually occurs at morpheme boundaries and it involves sounds that are associated with separate phonemes.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">One very obvious example to morphophonemics would be the use of indefinite in English language. Indefinite article in English has two manifestations: a and an. If a word begins with a consonantal sound then indefinite article is manifested as \u2018a\u2019 (a mango or a cat), while it is manifested as \u2018an\u2019 (an apple or an idiot) if following word starts with a vowel sound.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: The term \u2018sound\u2019 refers to the way a phone (consonant or vowel) is pronounced, not necessarily written, in English. Therefore, an hour is a correct phrase not *a hour and a university is the correct phrase not *an university.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Essential Vocabulary<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">To understand these kind of sound changes, i.e., morphophonemics, it\u2019s important to give a quick look to following concepts: the smallest unit of sound (both underlying and surface forms - phoneme and phone, respectively) minimal unit of meaning (both underlying and surface forms \u2013 morpheme and morph, respectively), and how these phonemes and morphemes may show variation in their shape given different contexts \u2013 known allophony and allomorphy, respectively). Allomorphs are derived from a single morpheme known as underlying representation with the help of morphophonemic rules.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">A. Phoneme: a phoneme is considered as a smallest unit of human speech sound that distinguishes meaning. Phonemes are usually written within slanted brackets \/\/. There are 26 letters in English alphabet. But these 26 letters represent 44 phonemes. For example, phoneme \/k\/ occurs in words such as cut, kite, school and skin.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">B. Phone: a phone is a surface manifestation\/form of a phoneme given a phonological environment. Phones are usually written within square brackets []. In English, phoneme \/p\/ is manifested (pronounced) as [p] in words like spat and spoon but as [ph] in words like pin, pick and poll.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">C. Morpheme: a morpheme is a minimal, i.e. indivisible, unit of meaning. Morphemes are of various types given their structure (free and bound), content (zero and null) and functions (derivational and inflexional).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">D. Morph: a morph is a surface manifestation\/form of morpheme given a phonological environment. For example, plural morpheme is realized as [s] (cats and bats), [z] (dogs and calls) and [\u0259z] (judges and churches) given different phonological environment.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">E. Allophone: an allophone is a phonetic variant of a phoneme in a particular language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">F. Allomorph: an allomorph is one of two or more complementary morphs which manifest a morph in its different phonological or morphological environments.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">G. Underlying Representation: an underlying representation is the most basic form of a morpheme\/word before any phonological, morphological or morphophonological rule has been applied to it. Underlying representation shows native speaker\u2019s knowledge about the abstract underlying phonology of the language.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">H. Surface Representation: A surface representation (actual occurrence) is the form of a word that is spoken and heard.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">I. Morphophonemic rules: A morphophonemic rule is written in form of a phonological rule but it is restricted to a particular morphological environment. Unlike phonological rules, morphophonemic rules are sensitive to their environment. Whenever morphological information is required\u00a0 to\u00a0 specify\u00a0 the\u00a0 environment\u00a0 for\u00a0 an phonological rule, the rule is morphophonemic.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">J. Phonological conditioning: phonological conditioning refers to the phenomenon wherein phonological environment of a morpheme determines selection and shape of its allomorph(s).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">K. Morphological conditioning: morphological conditioning is a conditioning wherein morphological environment of a morpheme determines selection and shape its allomorph(s).<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Steps involved in Morphophonemic Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Morphemes are stored in lexicon. They are strung together by morphological and syntactic rules. These morphemes are then converted to their surface forms by a sequence of ordered phonological rules. In doing morphophonemic analysis, our aim is to establish a transparent connection \u2013 as far as it is possible \u2013 between data and theory. The main purpose of morphophonemic analysis is to discover a set of underlying forms and the ordered rules which are consistent with the given data. Main steps involved in the process of morphophonemic analysis are as following:<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">I. Phonemicization: It is easier to perform morphophonemic analysis with data that are already expressed as phonemes. Therefore, it is recommended first to reduce the data into phonemes. This step is also referred as pre-processing of data in the process morphophonemic analysis.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">II. Morpheme division: The second step is to divide the words forms into their component morphemes. However, phonological alternations tend to obscure this division.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">III. Finding the allomorphs: Keeping visible and possible phonological alternation in mind, it\u2019s necessary to find the allomorph of each alternating morpheme. After allomorphs have been indentified, find the segment(s) which tend to alternate.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">IV. Active rules: After division of words into morphemes and identification of allomorphs, it is possible to state rules and their order of application.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">V. Setting up underlying representations: Taking into account the logical possibilities, underlying representations are to be set up so that all the possible allomorphs of each morpheme can be derived from a single underlying representation using general phonological rules. However, choosing underlying representations often involves considering more than one hypothesis. The following steps are usually helpful in determining correct underlying form:-<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Segments exhibiting X\u223cY alternation are underlyingly \/X\/, which is converted to [Y] in certain contexts by one or more phonological rules.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Segments exhibiting X\u223cY alternation are underlyingly \/Y\/, which is converted to [X] in certain contexts by one or more phonological rules.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Surface segments that do not alternate are assumed to be the same at the underlying level.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">For segments that alternate, consistently use the underlying segment. So, if there was a X\u223cY alternation and you determined that underlyingly the segment was \/X\/, then consistently write \/X\/ as the underlying representation in all lexcial items with the X\u223cY alternation.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Each morpheme has only one underlying representation form.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: An underlying form does not always necessarily correspond to the pronunciation of some pronounced word.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Morphophonemics Processes:<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Pluralisation in English<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">To understand the morphophonemics, it\u2019s very important to understand concepts A to K not only in isolation but also as to how they appear in a morphophonemic process. Here, we will present regular pluralisation process of English language. Below are given four set of single morpheme words and their plural counterparts in English. Both singular and plural forms have been presented with their respective IPA transcriptions.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"margin-top: 10.35pt\"><strong>Table 1<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 99.8788%;height: 448px\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><strong>Word (Singular)<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><strong>Word (Plural)<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">cut<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u028ct\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">cuts<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">kick<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ak\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">kicks<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ak<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">top<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0252p\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">tops<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0252p<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">dog<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0252\u0261\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">dog<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">rib<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/r\u026ab\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">rib<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/r\u026ab<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">kid<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ad\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">kid<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ad<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">judge<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">judges<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">wish<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/w\u026a\u0283\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">wishes<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/w\u026a\u0283<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">church<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0283\u025c\u02d0t\u0283\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">churches<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0283\u025c\u02d0t\u0283<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">shoe<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/\u0283u\u02d0\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">shoes<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/\u0283u\u02d0<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">day<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/de\u026a\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">days<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/de\u026a<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">pea<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/pi\u02d0\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">peas<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/pi\u02d0<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Upon careful observation of the data, it is noticed that plural morpheme in English is realized as \/-s\/, \/-z\/ and \/-\u0259z\/ given different phonological environment of the stem to which plural morpheme gets attached to. When one morpheme takes more than one form (morph) in different phonological or morphological environment, these morphs are referred as <strong>allomorph <\/strong>to one another. In this kind of situation, we need to set up a single <strong>underlying representation <\/strong>from which other morphs are derived for their pronunciation in any particular context. This underlying representation is achieved with the help of some rules, usually referred as <strong>morphophonemic rules.<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<strong>\u00a0<\/strong>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">To see how it works in English, we will consider the phonological environment of all three sets. Since in English language, plural morpheme gets attached to the right boundary (word+plural morpheme) of a morpheme, phonological environment of the right boundary will be taken into account for the consideration.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">First set consisting of \u2018<em>cut, kick and top\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in voiceless consonant which is non-strident. These morphemes take \/-s\/ allomorph.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Second set consisting of <em>\u2018dog, rib and kid\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in voiced consonant which is non-strident. These morphemes take \/-z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Third set consisting of <em>\u2018judge, wish and church\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in a consonant that strident in nature. These morphemes take \/-\u0259z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Fourth set consisting <em>\u2018shoe, day and pea\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in vowel. These morphemes also take \/-z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Therefore, it is evident allocation of plural allomorph in English is not random in nature but\u00a0 is conditioned by phonological environment occurring at right boundary of the morpheme. Usually, the allomorph with the wisest distribution qualifies as a suitable candidate for underlying representation. In this case, \/-z\/ qualifies to become underlying allomorph as it occurs after most voiced consonants and after all vowels. And from allomorph \/-z\/, other allomorphs \/-s\/ and \/-\u0259z\/ and \/\/have been derived. This whole process can be explained by (a set of) rules known as <strong>morphophonemic rules<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter wp-image-195\" src=\"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"816\" height=\"761\" \/>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table - 2<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">word + plural morpheme<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">cut-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">dog-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">judge-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 29.9394%\" rowspan=\"5\">order of rule application<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">underlying representation<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">\/k\u028ct-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">\/d\u0252\u0261-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">coda epenthesis<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">devoicing<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">-<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">surface form<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">[k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">[d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">[d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>]<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is to be noticed that it is not the correct morphophonemic rules but also the correct ordering of these rules is equally crucial. In absence of correct ordering, produced surface forms may well be incorrect. For example, if we change the ordering of coda epenthesis and devoicing rules in the above example, \/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292s\/* will get produced as a surface form for judges.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table -3<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">word + plural morpheme<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">cut-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">dog-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">judge-s<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 29.9394%\" rowspan=\"5\">order of rule application<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">underlying representation<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\/k\u028ct-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">\/d\u0252\u0261-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">devoicing<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">coda epenthesis<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">-<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">-<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">surface form<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">[k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">[d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">[d\u0292\u028cd\u0292s]*<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is clear that pronunciation, i.e., surface appearance, of plural allomorph in English depends on the phonological environment occurring at the right boundary of the morpheme. This phenomenon is also known as <strong>phonological conditioning <\/strong>and allomorphs \/-<strong>s<\/strong>\/, \/-<strong>z<\/strong>\/ and \/- \u0259z\/ are also referred as\u00a0 <strong>phonologically conditioned allomorphs<\/strong>. However, the regularity of phonological conditioning is restricted in its scope, that is, several morphemes despite of having suitable phonological environment for undergoing change may exhibit no or some different kind of phonological change, i.e. <em>the proximity of a sound(s) does not affect these forms<\/em>. For example, -<em>en <\/em>as a plural making morpheme is a peculiar case to only certain words such as <em>children, oxen, brethren, etc. <\/em>These kinds of changes are to due to what is called <strong>morphological conditioning<\/strong>. Occurrence of a morph\/form is determined by the morpheme it gets attached to rather than its phonological environment. To further support the concept, we will present another subclass of plurals in English, which defies the present phonological environment and does not let the morpheme undergo any change whereas another set having same phonological environment undergoes predictable changes.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">English has a restricted class of words in which sound \/f\/ at the right margin of the stem\/base alternates with \/v\/ when there is a plural suffix gets attached to them. However, the alternating class (first two columns) is unproductive. Any newly coined word(s) with final \/f\/ entering in English does not exhibit the f-v alternation.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table - 4<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\" colspan=\"2\">\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Alternating class<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\" colspan=\"2\"><strong>Non-alternating class<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">Singular<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">Plural<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">Singular<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">Plural<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">thief<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">thieves<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">chief<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">chiefs<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">wolf<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">wolves<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">laugh<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">laughs<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">knife<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">knives<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">fife<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">fifes<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">leaf<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">leaves<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">whiff<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">whiffs<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The process responsible for this f-v alternation and their respective derivations from underlying form \/z\/ is given as follows (Table 5):<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n\/f\/ Voicing\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nf \u2192 v \/ \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ]-Plural\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong> Table - 5<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">Word (alternating\r\n\r\nclass)<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">Plural form<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">Word (non-alternating\r\n\r\nclass)<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">Plural form<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 10.303%\" rowspan=\"6\">order of rule application\r\n\r\n&nbsp;<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">plural forms<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">knife<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">knives<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">laughs<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">laughs<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">underlying<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">\/na\u026af\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/na\u026af-z\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0f\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0f - z\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">representation<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">f \u2192 v rule<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/na\u026avz\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">devoicing<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0fs\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">Surface form<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">[na\u026avz]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">[l\u0251\u02d0fs]<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 10.303%\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As it is clear from the Table-3, order of rule application is equally important in this case too. Else, we will end up deriving incorrect plural form \/na\u026avs\/*.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">After discussing pluralization process, we can move to some other morphophonemic changes which are commonly found in English and other languages of the world.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>\u00a0Assimilation of Negative prefix \u2018in-\u2019 in English<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Assimilation is a sound change in which one sound becomes more like a following sound. This may occur either within words\/morphemes (phonological change) or between words\/morphemes (morphophonemic change). In the prefixation process, final sound (marginal sound) of a prefix becomes more like the first sound of a base\/root to which it attaches to. However, it usually happens when the articulation of the two sounds \u2013 last sound of the prefix and first sound of the base - carries some degree of feature similarity. The assimilation, however, does not always necessarily occur between two sequential sounds. Sometimes, sounds which are in distance, i.e., having some other sounds in-between, also tend to assimilate.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\nTo understand how assimilation affects pronunciation in English, we will examine the below given data:\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table - 6<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\"><strong>Word<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\"><strong>Negative prefix + word<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">possible<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+possible<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026ampos\u026ab\u0259l\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">balance<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+balance<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026amb\u00e6l\u0259ns\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">tolerable<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+tolerable<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026ant\u0252lr\u0259bl\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">decent<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+decent<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026andi\u02d0s\u0259nt\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">active<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+active<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026an\u00e6kt\u026av\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">alienable<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+ alienable<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026anel\u026a\u0259n\u0259bl\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">complete<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+ complete<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/i\u014bk\u028cmpli\u02d0t\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\u0261ratitude<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+\u0261ratitude<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026a\u014b\u0261r\u00e6t\u026atju\u02d0d\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">Now that it is clear that negative morpheme \u2018in-\u2019 manifests itself as [im-], [in] and [\u026a\u014b] allomorph. The occurrence of the appropriate allomorph is subject to following consonant, here, initial consonant of the following base\/root. We can make following observations based on the above given data:<\/div>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Allomorph [im-] occurs only before when following consonant is labial in nature\u2013[e.g. p, b, f, m].<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Occurrence of Allomorph [\u026a\u014b] only before the velar consonants \u2013 [k , g]<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Elsewhere, allomorph [in] is found to be appearing, that is to say, before alveolar consonants such as [t, d, s, z, n] and before vowels sounds such as [\u0259, \u028a, u, \u026a, i\u02d0]<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">It is evident that pronunciation of the nasal consonant of the prefix \u2018in-\u2019 is adjusted to match the place of articulation of the first consonant representing the following base\/morpheme. Of the three occurring allomorphs [im-], [in-] and [\u026a\u014b], the most frequently distributed morpheme is [in-]. Therefore, [in-] may be selected as underlying form of the \u2018in-\u2019 morpheme. These allomorphs are in complementary distribution, i.e., no two of them can occur in identical environment. This again is a clear and plain example of what is called phonological conditioning. However, we can also notice that the prepositional prefix \u2018in-\u2019 having same phonological environment does not always assimilate to the first sound of the following root\/base\/morpheme if the roots are of native origin. For examples, words such as inboard, inborn, inbound, inbreed, inlay, inland, inlet, inmate, input, inroad, etc., don\u2019t show any kind of assimilation.<\/div>\r\n<div><\/div>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">While negative prefix in-\u2019 shows a tendency for assimilating with the place of articulation of the following sound, the other negative prefixes such as \u2018un-\u2019 and \u2018non-\u2019 do not show any regular characteristics of assimilating behaviour. See some examples below:<\/p>\r\n\r\n<div>\r\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + polluted <\/em>\u2192 <em>unpolluted <\/em>(*<em>umpolluted<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + personal <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-personal <\/em>(*<em>nom-personal<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + balanced <\/em>\u2192 <em>unbalanced <\/em>(*<em>umbalanced<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + business <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-business <\/em>(*<em>nom-business<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\">( <em>un- + marked <\/em>\u2192 <em>unmarked <\/em>(*<em>ummarked<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- +medical <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-medical <\/em>(*<em>nom-medical<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\">(<em>un- + lawful <\/em>\u2192 <em>unlawful <\/em>(*<em>ullawful<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + legal <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-legal <\/em>(*<em>nol-legal<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + reasonable <\/em>\u2192 <em>unreasonable <\/em>(*<em>urreasonable<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + restrictive <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-restrictive <\/em>(*<em>nor-restrictive<\/em>)<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: right\">\u00a0 [see Okada, 2013<\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">If <em>in- <\/em>could be attached to all the words above instead of <em>un- <\/em>and <em>non-<\/em>, assimilation would be expected to take place.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong> Shift in English:<\/strong><\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Of the several active morphophonemic processes in English, one is shifting of stress from one syllable to another whenever a new morpheme gets attached to it. English is stress timed\u00a0<span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">language and primary stress falls normally on the first syllable of the word. However, it may appear on any syllable. Usually, deriving words via affixation may lead to shift of stress and thereby may lead to modification or change in one or more vowels. This is also addressed as vowel gradation or vowel alternation process. Let us have a quick look to the following data given Table 7. Syllable carrying primary stress have been marked in bold case.<\/span><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table -7<\/strong><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\" border=\"1\">\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20%\"><strong>word<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\"><strong>1<\/strong><strong>st <\/strong><strong>derivation<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\"><strong>2<\/strong><strong>nd <\/strong><strong>derivation<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><strong>3<\/strong><strong>rd <\/strong><strong>Derivation<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">photo<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\"><strong>pho<\/strong>tograph<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">pho<strong>to<\/strong>graphy<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\">photo<strong>gra<\/strong>phic<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">\/\u02c8f\u0259\u028a.t\u0259\u028a\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">\/\u02c8f\u0259\u028a.t\u0259.\u0261r\u0251\u02d0f\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">\/f\u0259\u02c8t\u0252\u0261.r\u0259.fi\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\">\/\u02ccf\u0259\u028a.t\u0259\u02c8\u0261r\u00e6f.\u026ak\/<\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20%\"><strong>dra<\/strong>ma<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">dra<strong>ma<\/strong>tic<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">dra<strong>mat<\/strong>ically<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">\/\u02c8dr\u0251\u02d0.m\u0259\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">\/dr\u0259\u02c8m\u00e6t.\u026ak\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">\/dr\u0259\u02c8m\u00e6t.\u026a.kl.i\/<\/td>\r\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As it is clear from the Table-7 that affixation process may lead to the shift of stress or gradation of vowels, however, this kind of change may be regular with one set of affixes and completely sporadic with other ones. Hence, rules describing stress patterns in English are\u00a0 not exhaustive in nature. Some rules may, anyway, be stated for the common understanding:-<\/p>\r\n<img class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-196\" src=\"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"684\" height=\"434\" \/>\r\n<div>\r\n\r\n<strong>Grammatical Conditioning andSuppletion:<\/strong>\r\n\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Unlike what we majorly discussed in the previous sections (Pluralisation in English and assimilation of negative prefix <em>in-<\/em>), sometimes phonological factors play no role in the selection of a particular allomorph. It is rather determined by a certain grammatical class. Its choice may be dependent on a certain grammatical class. A special allomorph may be required in a given grammatical context; there may not be any good phonological reason for its selection, however. For example, in irregular verbs such as see in English. <em>see, saw,\u00a0<\/em><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">seen <\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">determined by the present tense, past tense, and the non-progressive participle (these are grammatical features). There also exist a few morphemes whose allomorphs show no phonetic similarity. For example, comparative adjective form of <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">good<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">, i.e. <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">better<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">, contains lexeme <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">good <\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">but there is not a single common sound found between both of them. These kinds of cases, wherein two morphemes are phonetically unrelated, are referred as cases of <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">suppletion<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">.<\/span><\/p>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<strong>Useful notations<\/strong>\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Since morphemes are made of phonemes, they are expressed between slashes \u2018\/\/ \u2019.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The boundary between two morphemes is often represented either with plus sign \u2018+\u2019. Sometimes linguists also use a hyphen \u2018-\u2019 for expressing morpheme boundary.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Word boundaries are usually indicated with hash sign \u2018#\u2019.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A rule A B \/ C _ D, will be read as A changes into B in the environment when C precedes the sound A and D follows the sound A. The forward arrow (\u00a0 ) translates into \u2018changes into\u2019 and forward slash (\/) translates into \u2018in the environment of\u2019. A sometimes is also addressed as target, B as change and C &amp; D are trigger.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Notation \u2018_\u2019 is often referred as focus bar and this is where the change takes place.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Symbol \u2018\u00d8\u2019 for expressing process of deletion and epenthesis.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">\u03c3 - labelled parenthesis is used to indicate the syllable boundary.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Asterisk (*) refers to ungrammatical or unacceptable string of words.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<strong>Summary<\/strong>\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Phonology is regarded as the foundation for other branches of linguistics. Morpheme, a minimal distinctive unit of meaning, constitutes of nothing but a set of phoneme(s), a minimal unit of sound. The phonemes tend to behave interestingly when they get combined to produce a morpheme or other longer units such as syllables, words, phrases and sentences. Their combine (phonological) effect often crosses over so called boundaries in several subtle and visible ways. Sometimes the effect could be synchronic and sometimes it may be diachronic in nature. These effects may be regular or completely sporadic in their occurrences. In the discipline of morphophonemics, we study as to how morphological and phonological factors affect each other usually at morpheme boundaries involving separate phonemes. Morphophonemic properties of English or any other language for that matter are of great importance in order to analyze other linguistic properties of that language.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<table>\r\n<tbody>\r\n<tr>\r\n<td><strong>you can view video on Morpho-phonemics<\/strong><\/td>\r\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/GHnFhiqs8sU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\r\n<\/tr>\r\n<\/tbody>\r\n<\/table>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<strong>Reference<\/strong>\r\n<ol>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Chomsky, N., &amp; Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. MIT Press.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Chomsky, N., &amp; Halle, M. (1960). The morphophonemics of English. MIT Press.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Goldsmith, John A, et. al. ed (2014).The Handbook of Phonological Theory Oxford: Blackwell.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Hayes, B. (2011). Introductory phonology (Vol. 32). John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Kilbury, J. (1976). The development of morphophonemic theory (Vol. 10). John Benjamins Publishing.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Katamba, F., &amp; Stonham, J. (1993). Morphology (Modern Linguistics Series). London: Tottenham Court Road, 19-20.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Okada, A. (2013). Phonological Features of in-, un-and non. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 68, 123.<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Loos, Eugene E., et. al. ed. (2004). Glossary of Linguistic Terms: SIL International (retrieved from http:\/\/www-01.sil.org\/linguistics\/glossaryoflinguisticterms)<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Pike, K. L. (1971). Phonemics: a technique for reducing languages to writing. Michigan University Press<\/li>\r\n \t<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Spencer, A. (1995). Phonology: theory and description (Vol. 9). Wiley-Blackwell.<\/li>\r\n<\/ol>","rendered":"<div><span style=\"float: right\"><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/GHnFhiqs8sU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"epgp books\" width=\"51\" height=\"51\" \/><\/a><br \/>\n<\/span><\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Learning Outcomes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">After the completion of this module, the students would gain an insight into the key concepts of English morphophonemics. Students would be able to understand how morphological structure of a morpheme may affect pronunciation or phonological shape of following or preceding morphemes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Introduction<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">This chapter presents an introduction to English morphophonemics. Sound structure (phonology) and word structure (morphology) are two of the main components of a language system. However, many a times, these systems interact and affect each other in some interesting ways and give rise to a phenomenon which is known as \u2018morphophonemics\u2019 Sometimes, due to this interaction, pronunciation of a morpheme may get modified or completely changed. These changes may be regular or irregular and usually are context sensitive in nature. In \u2018morphophonemics\u2019, we specifically study the changes which occur at the margins\/boundaries of morphemes. There are many glossaries, lectures, notes and other reference materials available over the internet for further studies in this area. Some of the pioneer reference works are also listed in the reference section.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: In this module, IPA transcriptions of morphemes\/words have been throughout referred from Cambridge Online dictionary.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Background<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">In his book titled \u2018A Manual Of Phonology\u2019 Charles F. Hockett, Professor of linguistics and anthropology, says that language is nothing but a complex system of habits and this system can be broken down and categorized into five principle subsystems:<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">1. The phonological system: refers to the stock of phonemes and the systematic arrangements in which these phonemes occur in a language;<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">2. The grammatical system: refers to the stock of morphemes, the systematic arrangements in which these morphemes occur in a language;<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">3. The morphophonemic system: refers to the relational code that ties phonological and grammatical system together.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">4. The semantic system: refers to the association of morphemes, combinations of morphemes, and the systematic arrangements in which morphemes can be put, with things and situations, or kinds of things and situations.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">5. The phonetic system: refers to the process in which phonemes, sequences of phonemes of are converted into sound waves\/speech signals by a speaker, and these sound waves\/speech are then decoded from by a hearer.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Of these five principle subsystems, 1 to 3 are central, while 4-5 seem to be peripheral in nature to the language as a system. In this chapter, our main focus will be on 3 \u2018The morphophonemic system\u2019 and this focus will further be limited to scope in that examples and discussions will be revolve around morphophonemic system of English language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Morphophonemics<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Morphophonemics may be defined as analysis and classification of the phonological factors which affect the pronunciation of morphemes or, correspondingly, the morphological factors which affect the appearance of phonemes. In morphophonemics, we basically study interaction between morphological and phonological processes and how they these factors affect each other. Morphophonemic change usually occurs at morpheme boundaries and it involves sounds that are associated with separate phonemes.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">One very obvious example to morphophonemics would be the use of indefinite in English language. Indefinite article in English has two manifestations: a and an. If a word begins with a consonantal sound then indefinite article is manifested as \u2018a\u2019 (a mango or a cat), while it is manifested as \u2018an\u2019 (an apple or an idiot) if following word starts with a vowel sound.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: The term \u2018sound\u2019 refers to the way a phone (consonant or vowel) is pronounced, not necessarily written, in English. Therefore, an hour is a correct phrase not *a hour and a university is the correct phrase not *an university.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Essential Vocabulary<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">To understand these kind of sound changes, i.e., morphophonemics, it\u2019s important to give a quick look to following concepts: the smallest unit of sound (both underlying and surface forms &#8211; phoneme and phone, respectively) minimal unit of meaning (both underlying and surface forms \u2013 morpheme and morph, respectively), and how these phonemes and morphemes may show variation in their shape given different contexts \u2013 known allophony and allomorphy, respectively). Allomorphs are derived from a single morpheme known as underlying representation with the help of morphophonemic rules.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">A. Phoneme: a phoneme is considered as a smallest unit of human speech sound that distinguishes meaning. Phonemes are usually written within slanted brackets \/\/. There are 26 letters in English alphabet. But these 26 letters represent 44 phonemes. For example, phoneme \/k\/ occurs in words such as cut, kite, school and skin.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">B. Phone: a phone is a surface manifestation\/form of a phoneme given a phonological environment. Phones are usually written within square brackets []. In English, phoneme \/p\/ is manifested (pronounced) as [p] in words like spat and spoon but as [ph] in words like pin, pick and poll.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">C. Morpheme: a morpheme is a minimal, i.e. indivisible, unit of meaning. Morphemes are of various types given their structure (free and bound), content (zero and null) and functions (derivational and inflexional).<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">D. Morph: a morph is a surface manifestation\/form of morpheme given a phonological environment. For example, plural morpheme is realized as [s] (cats and bats), [z] (dogs and calls) and [\u0259z] (judges and churches) given different phonological environment.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">E. Allophone: an allophone is a phonetic variant of a phoneme in a particular language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">F. Allomorph: an allomorph is one of two or more complementary morphs which manifest a morph in its different phonological or morphological environments.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">G. Underlying Representation: an underlying representation is the most basic form of a morpheme\/word before any phonological, morphological or morphophonological rule has been applied to it. Underlying representation shows native speaker\u2019s knowledge about the abstract underlying phonology of the language.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">H. Surface Representation: A surface representation (actual occurrence) is the form of a word that is spoken and heard.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">I. Morphophonemic rules: A morphophonemic rule is written in form of a phonological rule but it is restricted to a particular morphological environment. Unlike phonological rules, morphophonemic rules are sensitive to their environment. Whenever morphological information is required\u00a0 to\u00a0 specify\u00a0 the\u00a0 environment\u00a0 for\u00a0 an phonological rule, the rule is morphophonemic.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">J. Phonological conditioning: phonological conditioning refers to the phenomenon wherein phonological environment of a morpheme determines selection and shape of its allomorph(s).<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">K. Morphological conditioning: morphological conditioning is a conditioning wherein morphological environment of a morpheme determines selection and shape its allomorph(s).<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Steps involved in Morphophonemic Analysis<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Morphemes are stored in lexicon. They are strung together by morphological and syntactic rules. These morphemes are then converted to their surface forms by a sequence of ordered phonological rules. In doing morphophonemic analysis, our aim is to establish a transparent connection \u2013 as far as it is possible \u2013 between data and theory. The main purpose of morphophonemic analysis is to discover a set of underlying forms and the ordered rules which are consistent with the given data. Main steps involved in the process of morphophonemic analysis are as following:<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">I. Phonemicization: It is easier to perform morphophonemic analysis with data that are already expressed as phonemes. Therefore, it is recommended first to reduce the data into phonemes. This step is also referred as pre-processing of data in the process morphophonemic analysis.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">II. Morpheme division: The second step is to divide the words forms into their component morphemes. However, phonological alternations tend to obscure this division.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">III. Finding the allomorphs: Keeping visible and possible phonological alternation in mind, it\u2019s necessary to find the allomorph of each alternating morpheme. After allomorphs have been indentified, find the segment(s) which tend to alternate.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">IV. Active rules: After division of words into morphemes and identification of allomorphs, it is possible to state rules and their order of application.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">V. Setting up underlying representations: Taking into account the logical possibilities, underlying representations are to be set up so that all the possible allomorphs of each morpheme can be derived from a single underlying representation using general phonological rules. However, choosing underlying representations often involves considering more than one hypothesis. The following steps are usually helpful in determining correct underlying form:-<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Segments exhibiting X\u223cY alternation are underlyingly \/X\/, which is converted to [Y] in certain contexts by one or more phonological rules.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Segments exhibiting X\u223cY alternation are underlyingly \/Y\/, which is converted to [X] in certain contexts by one or more phonological rules.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Surface segments that do not alternate are assumed to be the same at the underlying level.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">For segments that alternate, consistently use the underlying segment. So, if there was a X\u223cY alternation and you determined that underlyingly the segment was \/X\/, then consistently write \/X\/ as the underlying representation in all lexcial items with the X\u223cY alternation.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Each morpheme has only one underlying representation form.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">Note: An underlying form does not always necessarily correspond to the pronunciation of some pronounced word.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Morphophonemics Processes:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\"><strong>Pluralisation in English<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">To understand the morphophonemics, it\u2019s very important to understand concepts A to K not only in isolation but also as to how they appear in a morphophonemic process. Here, we will present regular pluralisation process of English language. Below are given four set of single morpheme words and their plural counterparts in English. Both singular and plural forms have been presented with their respective IPA transcriptions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"margin-top: 10.35pt\"><strong>Table 1<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 99.8788%;height: 448px\">\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><strong>Word (Singular)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><strong>Word (Plural)<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">cut<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u028ct\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">cuts<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">kick<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ak\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">kicks<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ak<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">top<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0252p\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">tops<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0252p<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">dog<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0252\u0261\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">dog<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">rib<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/r\u026ab\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">rib<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/r\u026ab<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">kid<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ad\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">kid<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/k\u026ad<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">judge<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">judges<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">wish<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/w\u026a\u0283\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">wishes<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/w\u026a\u0283<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">church<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0283\u025c\u02d0t\u0283\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">churches<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/t\u0283\u025c\u02d0t\u0283<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">shoe<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/\u0283u\u02d0\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">shoes<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/\u0283u\u02d0<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">day<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/de\u026a\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">days<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/de\u026a<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 28px\">\n<td style=\"width: 24.2424%;height: 28px\">pea<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.2727%;height: 28px\">\/pi\u02d0\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 20.8485%;height: 28px\">peas<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 27.5152%;height: 28px\">\/pi\u02d0<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Upon careful observation of the data, it is noticed that plural morpheme in English is realized as \/-s\/, \/-z\/ and \/-\u0259z\/ given different phonological environment of the stem to which plural morpheme gets attached to. When one morpheme takes more than one form (morph) in different phonological or morphological environment, these morphs are referred as <strong>allomorph <\/strong>to one another. In this kind of situation, we need to set up a single <strong>underlying representation <\/strong>from which other morphs are derived for their pronunciation in any particular context. This underlying representation is achieved with the help of some rules, usually referred as <strong>morphophonemic rules.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">To see how it works in English, we will consider the phonological environment of all three sets. Since in English language, plural morpheme gets attached to the right boundary (word+plural morpheme) of a morpheme, phonological environment of the right boundary will be taken into account for the consideration.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">First set consisting of \u2018<em>cut, kick and top\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in voiceless consonant which is non-strident. These morphemes take \/-s\/ allomorph.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Second set consisting of <em>\u2018dog, rib and kid\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in voiced consonant which is non-strident. These morphemes take \/-z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Third set consisting of <em>\u2018judge, wish and church\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in a consonant that strident in nature. These morphemes take \/-\u0259z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Fourth set consisting <em>\u2018shoe, day and pea\u2019 <\/em>morphemes have their right boundary ending in vowel. These morphemes also take \/-z\/ allomorph.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Therefore, it is evident allocation of plural allomorph in English is not random in nature but\u00a0 is conditioned by phonological environment occurring at right boundary of the morpheme. Usually, the allomorph with the wisest distribution qualifies as a suitable candidate for underlying representation. In this case, \/-z\/ qualifies to become underlying allomorph as it occurs after most voiced consonants and after all vowels. And from allomorph \/-z\/, other allomorphs \/-s\/ and \/-\u0259z\/ and \/\/have been derived. This whole process can be explained by (a set of) rules known as <strong>morphophonemic rules<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-195\" src=\"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"816\" height=\"761\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47.png 646w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47-300x280.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47-65x61.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47-225x210.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-47-350x327.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 816px) 100vw, 816px\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table &#8211; 2<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">word + plural morpheme<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">cut-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">dog-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">judge-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 29.9394%\" rowspan=\"5\">order of rule application<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">underlying representation<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">\/k\u028ct-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">\/d\u0252\u0261-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">coda epenthesis<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">devoicing<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">surface form<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.6364%\">[k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">[d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.303%\">[d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>\u0259z<\/strong>]<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is to be noticed that it is not the correct morphophonemic rules but also the correct ordering of these rules is equally crucial. In absence of correct ordering, produced surface forms may well be incorrect. For example, if we change the ordering of coda epenthesis and devoicing rules in the above example, \/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292s\/* will get produced as a surface form for judges.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table -3<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">word + plural morpheme<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">cut-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">dog-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">judge-s<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 29.9394%\" rowspan=\"5\">order of rule application<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">underlying representation<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\/k\u028ct-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">\/d\u0252\u0261-<strong>z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">\/d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-z<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">devoicing<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">\/k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">d\u0292\u028cd\u0292<strong>-s<\/strong>\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">coda epenthesis<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">&#8211;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 32.1212%\">surface form<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.7576%\">[k\u028ct<strong>s<\/strong>]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 11.8788%\">[d\u0252\u0261<strong>z<\/strong>]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 14.1818%\">[d\u0292\u028cd\u0292s]*<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">It is clear that pronunciation, i.e., surface appearance, of plural allomorph in English depends on the phonological environment occurring at the right boundary of the morpheme. This phenomenon is also known as <strong>phonological conditioning <\/strong>and allomorphs \/-<strong>s<\/strong>\/, \/-<strong>z<\/strong>\/ and \/- \u0259z\/ are also referred as\u00a0 <strong>phonologically conditioned allomorphs<\/strong>. However, the regularity of phonological conditioning is restricted in its scope, that is, several morphemes despite of having suitable phonological environment for undergoing change may exhibit no or some different kind of phonological change, i.e. <em>the proximity of a sound(s) does not affect these forms<\/em>. For example, &#8211;<em>en <\/em>as a plural making morpheme is a peculiar case to only certain words such as <em>children, oxen, brethren, etc. <\/em>These kinds of changes are to due to what is called <strong>morphological conditioning<\/strong>. Occurrence of a morph\/form is determined by the morpheme it gets attached to rather than its phonological environment. To further support the concept, we will present another subclass of plurals in English, which defies the present phonological environment and does not let the morpheme undergo any change whereas another set having same phonological environment undergoes predictable changes.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">English has a restricted class of words in which sound \/f\/ at the right margin of the stem\/base alternates with \/v\/ when there is a plural suffix gets attached to them. However, the alternating class (first two columns) is unproductive. Any newly coined word(s) with final \/f\/ entering in English does not exhibit the f-v alternation.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table &#8211; 4<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\" colspan=\"2\">\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Alternating class<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\" colspan=\"2\"><strong>Non-alternating class<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">Singular<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">Plural<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">Singular<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">Plural<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">thief<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">thieves<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">chief<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">chiefs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">wolf<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">wolves<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">laugh<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">laughs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">knife<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">knives<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">fife<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">fifes<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 31.0303%\">leaf<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 39.0303%\">leaves<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 16.4848%\">whiff<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 13.3333%\">whiffs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">The process responsible for this f-v alternation and their respective derivations from underlying form \/z\/ is given as follows (Table 5):<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>\/f\/ Voicing<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>f \u2192 v \/ \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 ]-Plural<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong> Table &#8211; 5<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">Word (alternating<\/p>\n<p>class)<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">Plural form<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">Word (non-alternating<\/p>\n<p>class)<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">Plural form<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.303%\" rowspan=\"6\">order of rule application<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">plural forms<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">knife<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">knives<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">laughs<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">laughs<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">underlying<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">\/na\u026af\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/na\u026af-z\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0f\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0f &#8211; z\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">representation<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">f \u2192 v rule<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/na\u026avz\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">devoicing<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">\/l\u0251\u02d0fs\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 18.0606%\">Surface form<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">[na\u026avz]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 18.1818%\"><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 17.5758%\">[l\u0251\u02d0fs]<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 10.303%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As it is clear from the Table-3, order of rule application is equally important in this case too. Else, we will end up deriving incorrect plural form \/na\u026avs\/*.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">After discussing pluralization process, we can move to some other morphophonemic changes which are commonly found in English and other languages of the world.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>\u00a0Assimilation of Negative prefix \u2018in-\u2019 in English<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Assimilation is a sound change in which one sound becomes more like a following sound. This may occur either within words\/morphemes (phonological change) or between words\/morphemes (morphophonemic change). In the prefixation process, final sound (marginal sound) of a prefix becomes more like the first sound of a base\/root to which it attaches to. However, it usually happens when the articulation of the two sounds \u2013 last sound of the prefix and first sound of the base &#8211; carries some degree of feature similarity. The assimilation, however, does not always necessarily occur between two sequential sounds. Sometimes, sounds which are in distance, i.e., having some other sounds in-between, also tend to assimilate.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>To understand how assimilation affects pronunciation in English, we will examine the below given data:<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table &#8211; 6<\/strong><\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\"><strong>Word<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\"><strong>Negative prefix + word<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\"><strong>IPA Transcription<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">possible<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+possible<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026ampos\u026ab\u0259l\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">balance<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+balance<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026amb\u00e6l\u0259ns\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">tolerable<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+tolerable<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026ant\u0252lr\u0259bl\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">decent<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+decent<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026andi\u02d0s\u0259nt\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">active<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+active<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026an\u00e6kt\u026av\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">alienable<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+ alienable<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026anel\u026a\u0259n\u0259bl\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">complete<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+ complete<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/i\u014bk\u028cmpli\u02d0t\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\u0261ratitude<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.2121%\">in+\u0261ratitude<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 33.3333%\">\/\u026a\u014b\u0261r\u00e6t\u026atju\u02d0d\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">Now that it is clear that negative morpheme \u2018in-\u2019 manifests itself as [im-], [in] and [\u026a\u014b] allomorph. The occurrence of the appropriate allomorph is subject to following consonant, here, initial consonant of the following base\/root. We can make following observations based on the above given data:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Allomorph [im-] occurs only before when following consonant is labial in nature\u2013[e.g. p, b, f, m].<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Occurrence of Allomorph [\u026a\u014b] only before the velar consonants \u2013 [k , g]<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Elsewhere, allomorph [in] is found to be appearing, that is to say, before alveolar consonants such as [t, d, s, z, n] and before vowels sounds such as [\u0259, \u028a, u, \u026a, i\u02d0]<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: justify\">It is evident that pronunciation of the nasal consonant of the prefix \u2018in-\u2019 is adjusted to match the place of articulation of the first consonant representing the following base\/morpheme. Of the three occurring allomorphs [im-], [in-] and [\u026a\u014b], the most frequently distributed morpheme is [in-]. Therefore, [in-] may be selected as underlying form of the \u2018in-\u2019 morpheme. These allomorphs are in complementary distribution, i.e., no two of them can occur in identical environment. This again is a clear and plain example of what is called phonological conditioning. However, we can also notice that the prepositional prefix \u2018in-\u2019 having same phonological environment does not always assimilate to the first sound of the following root\/base\/morpheme if the roots are of native origin. For examples, words such as inboard, inborn, inbound, inbreed, inlay, inland, inlet, inmate, input, inroad, etc., don\u2019t show any kind of assimilation.<\/div>\n<div><\/div>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: justify\">While negative prefix in-\u2019 shows a tendency for assimilating with the place of articulation of the following sound, the other negative prefixes such as \u2018un-\u2019 and \u2018non-\u2019 do not show any regular characteristics of assimilating behaviour. See some examples below:<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + polluted <\/em>\u2192 <em>unpolluted <\/em>(*<em>umpolluted<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + personal <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-personal <\/em>(*<em>nom-personal<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + balanced <\/em>\u2192 <em>unbalanced <\/em>(*<em>umbalanced<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + business <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-business <\/em>(*<em>nom-business<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\">( <em>un- + marked <\/em>\u2192 <em>unmarked <\/em>(*<em>ummarked<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- +medical <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-medical <\/em>(*<em>nom-medical<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\">(<em>un- + lawful <\/em>\u2192 <em>unlawful <\/em>(*<em>ullawful<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + legal <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-legal <\/em>(*<em>nol-legal<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>un- + reasonable <\/em>\u2192 <em>unreasonable <\/em>(*<em>urreasonable<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><em>non- + restrictive <\/em>\u2192 <em>non-restrictive <\/em>(*<em>nor-restrictive<\/em>)<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\" style=\"text-align: right\">\u00a0 [see Okada, 2013<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">If <em>in- <\/em>could be attached to all the words above instead of <em>un- <\/em>and <em>non-<\/em>, assimilation would be expected to take place.<\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong> Shift in English:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Of the several active morphophonemic processes in English, one is shifting of stress from one syllable to another whenever a new morpheme gets attached to it. English is stress timed\u00a0<span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">language and primary stress falls normally on the first syllable of the word. However, it may appear on any syllable. Usually, deriving words via affixation may lead to shift of stress and thereby may lead to modification or change in one or more vowels. This is also addressed as vowel gradation or vowel alternation process. Let us have a quick look to the following data given Table 7. Syllable carrying primary stress have been marked in bold case.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"no-indent\"><strong>Table -7<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse;width: 100%\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 20%\"><strong>word<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\"><strong>1<\/strong><strong>st <\/strong><strong>derivation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\"><strong>2<\/strong><strong>nd <\/strong><strong>derivation<\/strong><\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><strong>3<\/strong><strong>rd <\/strong><strong>Derivation<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">photo<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\"><strong>pho<\/strong>tograph<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">pho<strong>to<\/strong>graphy<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\">photo<strong>gra<\/strong>phic<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">\/\u02c8f\u0259\u028a.t\u0259\u028a\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">\/\u02c8f\u0259\u028a.t\u0259.\u0261r\u0251\u02d0f\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">\/f\u0259\u02c8t\u0252\u0261.r\u0259.fi\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\">\/\u02ccf\u0259\u028a.t\u0259\u02c8\u0261r\u00e6f.\u026ak\/<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 20%\"><strong>dra<\/strong>ma<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">dra<strong>ma<\/strong>tic<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">dra<strong>mat<\/strong>ically<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 20%\">\/\u02c8dr\u0251\u02d0.m\u0259\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 24.4848%\">\/dr\u0259\u02c8m\u00e6t.\u026ak\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 26.7879%\">\/dr\u0259\u02c8m\u00e6t.\u026a.kl.i\/<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 28.6061%\"><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">As it is clear from the Table-7 that affixation process may lead to the shift of stress or gradation of vowels, however, this kind of change may be regular with one set of affixes and completely sporadic with other ones. Hence, rules describing stress patterns in English are\u00a0 not exhaustive in nature. Some rules may, anyway, be stated for the common understanding:-<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"aligncenter size-full wp-image-196\" src=\"http:\/\/engp13.epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"684\" height=\"434\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48.png 684w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48-300x190.png 300w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48-65x41.png 65w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48-225x143.png 225w, https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/265\/2019\/06\/Untitled-48-350x222.png 350w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 684px) 100vw, 684px\" \/><\/p>\n<div>\n<p><strong>Grammatical Conditioning andSuppletion:<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Unlike what we majorly discussed in the previous sections (Pluralisation in English and assimilation of negative prefix <em>in-<\/em>), sometimes phonological factors play no role in the selection of a particular allomorph. It is rather determined by a certain grammatical class. Its choice may be dependent on a certain grammatical class. A special allomorph may be required in a given grammatical context; there may not be any good phonological reason for its selection, however. For example, in irregular verbs such as see in English. <em>see, saw,\u00a0<\/em><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">seen <\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">determined by the present tense, past tense, and the non-progressive participle (these are grammatical features). There also exist a few morphemes whose allomorphs show no phonetic similarity. For example, comparative adjective form of <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">good<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">, i.e. <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">better<\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">, contains lexeme <\/span><em style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">good <\/em><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">but there is not a single common sound found between both of them. These kinds of cases, wherein two morphemes are phonetically unrelated, are referred as cases of <\/span><strong style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">suppletion<\/strong><span style=\"text-align: initial;font-size: 1em\">.<\/span><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>Useful notations<\/strong><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Since morphemes are made of phonemes, they are expressed between slashes \u2018\/\/ \u2019.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">The boundary between two morphemes is often represented either with plus sign \u2018+\u2019. Sometimes linguists also use a hyphen \u2018-\u2019 for expressing morpheme boundary.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Word boundaries are usually indicated with hash sign \u2018#\u2019.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">A rule A B \/ C _ D, will be read as A changes into B in the environment when C precedes the sound A and D follows the sound A. The forward arrow (\u00a0 ) translates into \u2018changes into\u2019 and forward slash (\/) translates into \u2018in the environment of\u2019. A sometimes is also addressed as target, B as change and C &amp; D are trigger.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Notation \u2018_\u2019 is often referred as focus bar and this is where the change takes place.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Symbol \u2018\u00d8\u2019 for expressing process of deletion and epenthesis.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">\u03c3 &#8211; labelled parenthesis is used to indicate the syllable boundary.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Asterisk (*) refers to ungrammatical or unacceptable string of words.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><strong>Summary<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify\">Phonology is regarded as the foundation for other branches of linguistics. Morpheme, a minimal distinctive unit of meaning, constitutes of nothing but a set of phoneme(s), a minimal unit of sound. The phonemes tend to behave interestingly when they get combined to produce a morpheme or other longer units such as syllables, words, phrases and sentences. Their combine (phonological) effect often crosses over so called boundaries in several subtle and visible ways. Sometimes the effect could be synchronic and sometimes it may be diachronic in nature. These effects may be regular or completely sporadic in their occurrences. In the discipline of morphophonemics, we study as to how morphological and phonological factors affect each other usually at morpheme boundaries involving separate phonemes. Morphophonemic properties of English or any other language for that matter are of great importance in order to analyze other linguistic properties of that language.<\/p>\n<table>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><strong>you can view video on Morpho-phonemics<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><a href=\"https:\/\/youtu.be\/GHnFhiqs8sU\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone wp-image-120\" src=\"http:\/\/epgpbooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/11\/download.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"36\" height=\"36\" \/><\/a><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<p><strong>Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Chomsky, N., &amp; Halle, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. MIT Press.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Chomsky, N., &amp; Halle, M. (1960). The morphophonemics of English. MIT Press.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Goldsmith, John A, et. al. ed (2014).The Handbook of Phonological Theory Oxford: Blackwell.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Hayes, B. (2011). Introductory phonology (Vol. 32). John Wiley &amp; Sons.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Kilbury, J. (1976). The development of morphophonemic theory (Vol. 10). John Benjamins Publishing.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Katamba, F., &amp; Stonham, J. (1993). Morphology (Modern Linguistics Series). London: Tottenham Court Road, 19-20.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Okada, A. (2013). Phonological Features of in-, un-and non. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 68, 123.<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Loos, Eugene E., et. al. ed. (2004). Glossary of Linguistic Terms: SIL International (retrieved from http:\/\/www-01.sil.org\/linguistics\/glossaryoflinguisticterms)<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Pike, K. L. (1971). Phonemics: a technique for reducing languages to writing. Michigan University Press<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify\">Spencer, A. (1995). Phonology: theory and description (Vol. 9). Wiley-Blackwell.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"menu_order":15,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["mr-pankaj-dwivedi"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[80],"license":[],"class_list":["post-192","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-mr-pankaj-dwivedi"],"part":3,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/192","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/192\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":194,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/192\/revisions\/194"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/3"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/192\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=192"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=192"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=192"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ebooks.inflibnet.ac.in\/engp13\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=192"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}